How Much Revenue Is Your Engineering Consultancy Losing?
This assessment estimates the revenue your firm may be losing by pursuing poorly qualified opportunities,
underpricing high-value engineering work, and missing projects that require a stronger knowledge base,
trigger system, and execution workflow.
Find Out in 90 Seconds
Answer 5 questions to estimate annual revenue at risk from weak go/no-go decisions,
low-value pursuits, poor client fit, and missed strategic engineering opportunities.
Engineering firms do not lose money only when they lose proposals.
They also lose money when they win the wrong work: low-margin clients, unclear scope,
poor stakeholder alignment, weak data security requirements, and projects with no execution workflow.
A market-value-driven intake system helps qualify better clients before your engineers spend proposal time.
Question 1 of 5
20% Complete
Section 1 — Opportunity Volume
How many engineering project opportunities does your firm evaluate or pursue each year?
Include RFPs, direct inquiries, municipal projects, private-sector proposals, feasibility studies,
design contracts, consulting retainers, and engineering innovation projects.
Section 2 — Poor-Fit Pursuits
What percentage of those opportunities are weak-fit, low-margin, underfunded, or unlikely to close?
These are projects pursued without strong market-value qualification, stakeholder fit,
budget confirmation, technical authority, or a clear go/no-go decision.
Section 3 — Average Project Value
What is the average contract value of the engineering projects your firm wants to win?
Use the realistic value of a qualified project, not the value of small troubleshooting calls or low-value work.
Section 4 — Margin and Proposal Cost
What is your typical gross margin on qualified engineering work?
This helps estimate the profit impact of replacing low-value pursuits with better-qualified,
higher-margin engineering projects.
Section 5 — Missed Strategic Opportunity
How much larger could your best-fit projects become with better intake, knowledge base, triggers, and workflow?
Consider projects that expand from a single engineering task into planning, risk mitigation,
data security, documentation, media review, e-commerce support, brand ambassador programs,
innovation workflows, or long-term execution support.
Your Estimated Annual Revenue at Risk
Based on your answers, this estimates the annual revenue and profit your engineering consultancy may be losing
by not using a market-value-driven intake system to qualify clients, prioritize pursuits, and expand strategic project value.
$0 / year
$0
Revenue Tied to Poor-Fit Pursuits
$0
Estimated Gross Profit at Risk
$0
Missed Strategic Expansion Value
0
Poor-Fit Opportunities Consuming Attention
A market-value-driven intake system helps engineering consultancies identify strategic fit,
score project value, protect data and business risk, document scope, trigger internal workflows,
and guide go/no-go decisions before expensive proposal labor is committed.
Schedule an Appointment to Build This Engineering Intake System
Click below to discuss a qualification system that scores client value, risk, stakeholder fit,
proposal readiness, knowledge-base needs, triggers, and execution workflows.
Choose My Appointment Time
Retake Assessment
Next step: Choose a date and time below to discuss how Control Tower .Biz can help your engineering consultancy qualify higher-value clients.