By Lilit Marcus, CNN
(CNN) — Kevin Miller considers himself a bit of a travel pro. The photographer says he’s able to fit all of his camera gear into a carry-on bag and mentally puts himself into “airplane mode” as soon as he closes the door on his taxi, a process singularly pointed at getting himself through the airport as quickly and efficiently as possible.
But on one fateful day in Bali in 2013, his usual machine-level precision hit an unexpected wrinkle. He’d checked in, selected a seat, spent the last of his Indonesian rupiah on a souvenir in the airport, and zoomed through the security line. Then he was asked to pay a departure fee.
Miller admits he was frustrated but quickly set to work getting the money — it had to be cash — he needed to exit the airport. But it was early in the morning and the currency exchange counters were yet to open, and none of the ATMs were functioning. Finally, an American tourist took pity on him and handed Miller the needed bills. When he asked to get the man’s business card to repay him later, the man shook his head and said he’d been in the same situation before.
“It felt like a curveball because it came out of nowhere,” Miller says. Due to the extra time spent running around the airport, he and his wife missed their flight to Kuala Lumpur.
“We had to catch the next flight, which we had to pay for, because it was an airport issue and not an airline issue.”
A ‘regressive’ tax?
Thousands of passengers pay departure taxes every day, but most have no idea. While some countries still ask for cash in hand from tourists as they leave the airport, most of these fees are baked into the cost of airline tickets. Indonesia, where Miller had his hectic experience, moved to this system in 2014.
These fees, though, are common. Most departure taxes go toward infrastructure projects, including maintaining the very airports they’re collected in.
According to a report released by the International Air Transport Association (IATA), airports around the world collected a total of $60.4 billion in departure taxes and other similar fees in 2024, an average of $6.80 per passenger. Generally, these fees are highest in North America and lowest in Asia-Pacific.
In 2024, Argentina charged the highest rate, amounting to an average of $138 per passenger, according to IATA. Behind it were Mauritius, Mexico, the UK, the Dominican Republic, the US, Egypt and Kenya.
Are these fees worth it? IATA would say no.
“Air ticket taxes are regressive in nature and may conflict with broader economic and social objectives as they place a significant burden on the traveling public, and do not meaningfully contribute to the government’s budgets,” says the group in its report, which was released in November 2025.
In the travel industry, fees like these have become a major talking point in the post-pandemic years, as rising overtourism continues to strain resources around the world.
Japan, which has been struggling with recent increases in visitor numbers, debuted a “sayonara tax” of 1,000 yen (about $6) in 2019 and has just announced plans to triple it. This cost is added to airline ticket prices, not collected in person.
A need for transparency?
These tourist fees have different names all over the world and aren’t centralized, making it harder for travelers to know what exactly they’re paying for.
In Australia’s airports, it’s called a Passenger Movement Charge and costs $70AUD ($40 US). In the UK, the Air Passenger Duty varies based on destination, with a maximum of £253 ($336) for long-haul flights. In Mexico, it’s the TUA (Tarifa de Uso de Aeropuerto) and each airport gets to set its own rate.
Some places, though, have decided these fees aren’t worth it. Sweden abolished its air travel tax last year. It was part of a larger eff