Click on the Manage Content for adding and managing content.
Click on the Rotator Settings and choose what and how it will be displayed.

The end of the line: New York City’s iconic MetroCard is about to go out of service

Kraig Pakulski 0 122 Article rating: No rating

By Elisabeth Buchwald, CNN

New York (CNN) — For more than three decades, lifelong New Yorkers and tourists visiting the Big Apple have shared the experience of a MetroCard swipe gone wrong. Swiping the transit card too fast or too slow, with the stripe facing the wrong side, or having insufficient fare all led to the subsequent, seemingly judgmental thud of the turnstile slamming into you.

“It’s embarrassing. You feel like you’re not an authentic New Yorker if you’re not swiping your MetroCard the right way,” said Mike Glenwick, 37, who has lived in the city most of his life and has been collecting limited-edition MetroCards since he was six.

Now the days of swiping the blue and yellow plastic cards are numbered. Come January 1, the Metropolitan Transit Authority will no longer sell MetroCards, and riders will be required to use OMNY, a contactless fare payment system. (Existing MetroCards will continue to be accepted at terminals, though MTA said their “final acceptance date will be announced at a later time.”)

Bidding farewell to the card has been a journey for New Yorkers and the MTA alike.

From tokens to cards

New York City subway’s iconic tokens were the default form of fare payment before the MetroCard was introduced. When tokens were initially rolled out in 1953, they were about the size of a dime and most had a hollowed-out Y between an engraved N and C, spelling out NYC.

Though clunky to carry around, they were easy to use: all transit passengers had to do was drop the tokens into a turnstile or farebox. For the MTA, it overcame the issue of being able to increase fares without having to redesign fare collection systems to accept various kinds of coins.

But in 1983 Richard Ravitch, then the commissioner of the MTA, began to envision a different fare payment system. Instead, he floated a magnetic stripe card with a stored value.

“His argument was that New York is a very modern cosmopolitan city and there are other modern cosmopolitan cities that are using this as their fare payment system,” said Jodi Shapiro, curator of the FAREwell MetroCard exhibit at the New York Transit Museum. But as his idea gained traction, it quickly became about more than just keeping up with other cities. At one point the MTA considered integrating MetroCards with pay phones so callers didn’t have to use coins (that didn’t end up happening, though).

The MTA initially thought the shift to MetroCards would “spell the death knell for fare evasion” since many riders were previously getting away with using various other kinds of coins and tokens, said Noah McClain, a sociology professor who has researched MetroCard technology and fare evasion trends. But that was hardly the case: “Fare evasion certainly endured, albeit often in different forms.”

One famous one, “swipers,” as they came to be known, sold bent MetroCards that allowed riders to fraudulently bypass turnstiles. Separately, a group of hackers was able to successfully reverse engineer many parts of the MetroCard.

But riders saw benefits, too. One of the biggest selling points for the MetroCard was that users could purchase different, more flexible fares. That included discounts for seniors, disabled people and students, as well as cards that offered unlimited rides throughout the month.

Cards also came with a massive perk that tokens didn’t: free transfers. One swipe of a MetroCard on a bus or subway meant riders didn’t have to pay again if they transferred to another bus or subway train.

A collector’s item

But just as New York subway tokens became icons of the city, so did the MetroCard. And that was by design.

“MetroCards were made to be collected,” Shapiro said. The year the MTA launched the MetroCard, 1994, was also when it released an inaugural limited edition card. Since then there have been around 400 co

Wind Advisory issued December 28 at 1:08AM PST until December 28 at 10:00PM PST by NWS Los Angeles/Oxnard CA

Kraig Pakulski 0 66 Article rating: No rating

* WHAT…For the Wind Advisory, northeast winds 20 to 30 mph with
gusts up to 45 mph expected. For the High Wind Watch, northeast
winds 25 to 40 mph with gusts up to 65 mph possible.

* WHERE…Interstate 5 Corridor, Santa Susana Mountains, Western San
Gabriel Mountains and Highway 14 Corridor, and Western Santa
Monica Mountains Recreational Area.

* WHEN…For the Wind Advisory, from 6 PM to 10 PM PST this evening.
For the High Wind Watch, from 10 PM Sunday through Monday
afternoon.

* IMPACTS…Damaging winds could blow down trees and power lines.
Widespread power outages are possible. Travel could be difficult,
especially for high profile vehicles. In addition, unsecured
objects will be blown around.

* ADDITIONAL DETAILS…Wet soils will increase the likelihood of
damage.
Monitor the latest forecasts and warnings for updates.

The post Wind Advisory issued December 28 at 1:08AM PST until December 28 at 10:00PM PST by NWS Los Angeles/Oxnard CA appeared first on News Channel 3-12.

Zelensky and Trump to meet in Florida after weeks of intensive peace talks

Kraig Pakulski 0 57 Article rating: No rating

By Kevin Liptak, CNN

West Palm Beach, Florida (CNN) — Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky arrives here Sunday as his frozen capital of Kyiv comes under assault by Russian missiles and drones, a deadly reminder from the war’s aggressor that its attacks would continue even amid accelerated peace talks.

The 1 p.m. ET Mar-a-Lago meeting between Zelensky and President Donald Trump, announced only two days beforehand, is intended to close gaps in the original 28-point peace plan that Trump first proposed last month and which Ukraine has since revised to 20 points. Intensive work has been underway by American envoys to finalize a proposal both Ukraine and Russia can agree on.

Trump, who has been in Palm Beach since December 20, will interrupt his holiday break for the discussion. The meeting was arranged after Zelensky held an hourlong phone call late last week with Steve Witkoff, Trump’s foreign envoy, and Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law who is working to finalize the peace agreement.

Trump said earlier this month he didn’t think meetings with Zelensky or his European allies would be useful unless they were close to reaching a deal, a sign of the negotiations’ advanced stage. American officials have described significant progress in the peace efforts, with a US official saying earlier this month that 90% of the terms of the deal had been settled. Zelensky affirmed that figure Friday.

“It isn’t easy. No one is saying that it will be 100% right away, but nevertheless, we must bring the desired result closer with every such meeting, every such conversation,” he said.

The remaining 10% have proved difficult to resolve and include the thorny issue of land concessions that will be necessary to end the nearly four-year war. Russia has not backed off its maximalist demands, including that Ukraine surrender the entire eastern Donbas region.

Zelensky, however, is no longer ruling out concessions entirely, and says he would bring the peace plan up for a referendum if Russia agrees to a ceasefire. (Ukraine’s constitution requires any changes to the country’s borders to be approved in a referendum.)

The US side has offered “thought-provoking” ideas on how to resolve the impasse, one US official said, including the development of an “economic free zone” in the eastern part of Ukraine.

Also unresolved is the fate of the Russia-occupied Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, Europe’s largest. Zelensky said Kyiv proposes the plant be operated by a joint enterprise between the US and Ukraine, with 50% of the electricity output going to Ukraine and the remainder allocated by the US.

Russia will not be represented at Sunday’s meeting, and it remains unclear whether Moscow is willing to agree to an immediate ceasefire that would allow a peace plan to take hold. Trump has frequently pointed to both Ukraine and Russia as obstacles to peace.

Speaking a day before the meeting, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that “if Kyiv is not willing to resolve the matter peacefully, Russia will accomplish all the aims of the special military operation by military means,” using a euphemism for the war in Ukraine, according to Russian state media service TASS.

Russia launched 519 drones and 40 missiles at Ukraine overnight into Saturday, according to Ukraine’s air force. Zelensky said Saturday morning that while Russian officials are engaging in talks to end fighting, the ongoing violence speaks for itself.

American officials are hopeful the meeti

Por qué la visita de Netanyahu a Mar-a-Lago es el acto de apertura de la campaña de reelección del primer ministro israelí

Kraig Pakulski 0 57 Article rating: No rating

Análisis por Tal Shalev, CNN

Cuando el primer ministro de Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, se reúna con el presidente de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, en Mar-a-Lago esta semana, el encuentro marcará algo más que una reunión diplomática.

Para Netanyahu, es el acto de apertura de su campaña de reelección de 2026, en la que el presidente de Estados Unidos está posicionado para desempeñar un papel protagónico.

Israel tiene programadas oficialmente elecciones para octubre de 2026, aunque ese calendario podría adelantarse. Dos amenazas inmediatas se ciernen sobre la coalición de Netanyahu: la crisis de reclutamiento ultraortodoxo y la fecha límite presupuestaria de marzo de 2026. Cualquiera de las dos podría desencadenar elecciones anticipadas.

El sexto Gobierno de Netanyahu —que abarca 18 años a lo largo de varios mandatos— ha soportado una agitación extraordinaria, desde la reforma judicial de 2023 que sacó a cientos de miles a las calles, pasando por el ataque de Hamas del 7 de octubre de 2023 que mató a más de 1.200 israelíes, hasta la guerra prolongada que siguió, dejando a Israel diplomáticamente aislado y profundamente dividido.

Sin embargo, Netanyahu ha resistido. Su coalición ha durado más que cualquier otro Gobierno israelí de los últimos seis años, dándole tiempo para restaurar la disuasión regional de Israel mientras evita una investigación sustancial sobre la toma de decisiones que precedió a la inédita falla de seguridad del 7 de octubre de 2023.

Encuestas de opinión recurrentes desde octubre de 2023 muestran que su coalición no alcanza la mayoría de 61 escaños en la Knesset necesaria para gobernar, situándose entre 49 y 54 escaños. Su estrategia de reelección parece depender de un cálculo simple: alejarse lo más posible del fracaso del 7 de octubre y contar con Trump para ayudar a reescribir esa narrativa en las urnas.

“El presidente de Estados Unidos será central —si no el protagonista— en la estrategia de reelección de Netanyahu”, dijo Nadav Shtrauchler, un estratega político que trabajó anteriormente para el primer ministro.

La alianza tiene precedentes. Durante los tumultuosos ciclos electorales de Israel en 2019-2020, el Likud empapeló las calles israelíes con carteles que mostraban a Donald Trump y Benjamin Netanyahu dándose la mano, con la leyenda “Netanyahu, en otra liga”. Trump realizó gestos simbólicos en momentos clave de la campaña: reconoció la soberanía israelí sobre los Altos del Golán en 2019, presentó un plan de paz palestino en 2020 y encabezó los Acuerdos de Abraham.

Más recientemente, Trump apoyó la campaña de indulto para Netanyahu, apelando públicamente al presidente de Israel, Isaac Herzog, durante un discurso en la Knesset en octubre para celebrar el alto el fuego en Gaza. “Oiga, tengo una idea, señor presidente: ¿por qué no le concede un indulto?”, preguntó Trump, desestimando los cargos de corrupción contra Netanyahu como asuntos triviales de “puros y champán”.

El episodio desató una campaña alineada con el Likud que culminó en la propia solicitud formal de clemencia de Netanyahu. En un video que acompañó su petición, Netanyahu hizo referencia al respaldo de Trump, afirmando que esto “permitiría a ambos líderes promover intereses vitales en un momento de oportunidad fugaz”.

Shtrauchler identifica ese discurso en la Knesset como “de facto el la

Estos propietarios de pequeñas empresas quedarán sin seguro después de que expiren los subsidios clave de la ACA

Kraig Pakulski 0 43 Article rating: No rating

Por Tami Luhby, CNN

Cuando los pacientes acuden al consultorio de quiropráctica de Eric Frankenfeld con problemas de seguro, su esposa Lisa, la administradora de la oficina, les dice que no se preocupen porque trabajará con ellos para mantener la atención asequible.

Pero a partir de enero, los Frankenfeld podrían tener que pedir el mismo trato a sus propios médicos, ya que quedarán sin seguro. La pareja de Point Pleasant, Nueva Jersey, ya no podrá pagar su plan de Obamacare después de que los subsidios mejorados a las primas expiren a fin de año. Decidieron prescindir de la cobertura tras enterarse de que la prima de su plan se disparará a US$ 1.928 al mes, frente a los US$ 340 de este año.

Aunque ambos gozan de buena salud, la idea de perder la cobertura le quita el sueño a Lisa Frankenfeld, de 62 años, quien teme que alguno de los dos pueda ser diagnosticado con cáncer, sufrir un derrame cerebral o un ataque cardíaco, o tener un accidente grave.

“Somos proveedores de atención médica que no pueden pagar beneficios. Oh, la ironía”, le dijo a CNN. “Comprar un plan no tiene sentido financiero. Simplemente vamos a cruzar los dedos y esperar lo mejor”.

Los Frankenfeld están entre los millones de inscritos en la Ley de Atención Médica Asequible (ACA, por sus siglas en inglés) que enfrentan decisiones difíciles en esta temporada de inscripción abierta, que termina el 15 de enero en la mayoría de los estados. Más del 90 % de los titulares de pólizas de la ACA —unos 22 millones de personas— reciben los subsidios mejorados, lo que impulsó un número récord de inscripciones en la cobertura de Obamacare este año.

Una parte considerable de esos inscritos son trabajadores autónomos o son dueños o empleados de pequeñas empresas. Casi la mitad de los adultos en el mercado de seguros de salud individuales —la gran mayoría de los cuales se adquieren a través de los intercambios de Obamacare— están vinculados a una pequeña empresa, según KFF, un grupo de investigación de políticas de salud no partidista.

Las pólizas de los empleadores suelen ser demasiado costosas para las pequeñas empresas y para quienes trabajan por cuenta propia, lo que lleva a muchos a recurrir a los intercambios de la Ley de Atención Médica Asequible. Y aunque varios dijeron a CNN que su cobertura de Obamacare les exige gastar mucho de su propio bolsillo para la atención médica, dicen que sigue siendo mejor que estar sin seguro.

Sin embargo, sin los subsidios mejorados, que fueron promulgados por la administración Biden como parte de un paquete de ayuda por el covid-19 en 2021, se espera que los pagos de las primas de los inscritos aumenten un 114 % en promedio el próximo año. El vencimiento de esta disposición también significa que los consumidores que ganan más del 400 % del nivel federal de pobreza —alrededor de US$ 62.600 para una persona y US$ 84.600 para una pareja— ya no calificarán para ninguna ayuda federal.

La Cámara de Representantes tiene previsto votar en enero la extensión de la asistencia reforzada por tres años, después de que cuatro republicanos se desmarcaran de su bancada y apoyaran una propuesta demócrata. Pero la medida enfrenta un camino difícil en el Senado, que rechazó un proyecto demócrata similar a principios de este mes.

Cada vez más

RSS
First40564057405840594061406340644065Last