Click on the Manage Content for adding and managing content.
Click on the Rotator Settings and choose what and how it will be displayed.

NTSB probes why a UPS jet lost an engine and crashed on takeoff

Kraig Pakulski 0 18 Article rating: No rating

By Alexandra Skores, CNN

Washington (CNN) — The National Transportation Safety Board will meet Tuesday and Wednesday to investigate why a UPS McDonnell Douglas MD-11F lost an engine and crashed after taking off last year from Louisville, Kentucky.

The hearing comes just days after the Federal Aviation Administration cleared the same type of aircraft to return to the skies.

On November 4, UPS flight 2976, a cargo plane headed to Hawaii, crashed moments after taking off from Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport, spreading flames and wreckage for a half-mile and sending black smoke billowing into the sky. Fourteen people died, including the three crew members on the plane 23 people on the ground were injured.

The UPS freighter was a 34-year-old jet with three engines: two on the wings and one on the tail.

Now, over the two days of the hearing, the NTSB will question witnesses, including representatives of UPS, the pilot’s union, the FAA and Boeing, to help determine what went wrong.

Preliminary findings show fatigue cracks, overstressing

The agency already determined a pair of structural fittings that kept the left jet engine attached to the wing failed, according to a preliminary NTSB report.

Airport surveillance video the NTSB analyzed frame by frame showed the engine separating and going up and over the wing before falling alongside the runway. The plane spewed fire and only got about 30 feet in the air before crashing into a warehouse, storage yard, and petroleum recycling facility.

The pieces attaching the engine to the wing, known as lugs, showed signs of fatigue cracking and over-stressing, investigators said.

Three days after the crash, UPS grounded its MD-11 planes, and the following day the FAA grounded all MD-11 planes in the United States until inspections were completed. At the time of the crash, MD-11 aircraft made up approximately 9% of UPS’ fleet, the carrier said. FedEx and Western Global Airlines also flew the same type of aircraft.

Last week, “after extensive review, the FAA approved Boeing’s protocol for safely returning MD-11 airplanes to service,” the agency told CNN in a statement.

Boeing, the manufacturer is responsible for the MD-11 since it bought McDonnell Douglas, provided inspection and repair instructions. Boeing “continues to provide technical support and guidance to help them meet FAA requirements,” a company spokesperson told CNN.

UPS announced it does not plan to fly its MD-11s any longer. However FedEx has already resumed some flights with repaired and inspected aircraft.

Unanswered questions

During this week’s hearings, more details about what caused the crash are expected to be made public.

All previous maintenance will be reviewed, including overhaul work done for six weeks that the aircraft was out of service in September and October in San Antonio, Texas. The plane resumed flying for UPS less than a month before the crash.

The information from the cockpit voice recorder and flight data recorder will indicate what the pilots said and how they reacted to the troubled flight.

Investigators will also probe what information UPS was required to report to Boeing and the FAA, operational safety process and engine attachment designs.

A final report from the NTSB is typically expected in 18 to 24 months after an accident, d

Juez dictamina que los escritos del cuaderno de Luigi Mangione y el arma incautada en su mochila serán admitidos como prueba

Kraig Pakulski 0 23 Article rating: No rating

Por Nicki Brown y Kara Scannell, CNN

Un juez de Nueva York dictaminó este lunes que algunas pruebas encontradas en la mochila de Luigi Mangione en el momento de su detención serán excluidas de su próximo juicio, aunque sí serán admitidos otros elementos clave, como una pistola impresa en 3D y escritos que expresan frustración con el sector sanitario.

Aunque algunas de las pertenencias de Mangione fueron excluidas del caso, el fallo mixto representa en gran medida una victoria para los fiscales, quienes podrán mostrar al jurado el llamado “manifiesto” y el arma de fuego que, según afirman, se utilizó para matar al CEO de UnitedHealthcare, Brian Thompson.

Los abogados de Mangione argumentaron que la policía local registró ilegalmente su mochila cuando fue arrestado en un McDonald’s de Pensilvania en diciembre de 2024, días después de que Thompson fuera asesinado a tiros en una acera de Manhattan.

Los agentes continuaron registrando la mochila en la comisaría de Altoona antes de solicitar una orden de registro ese mismo día.

El juez Gregory Carro dictaminó que la fiscalía puede usar el arma y una libreta roja con anotaciones manuscritas en el juicio.

Estos objetos, entre otros, fueron recuperados como parte de un registro válido según el protocolo del Departamento de Policía de Altoona, escribió Carro en su resolución.

Sin embargo, los objetos encontrados durante el registro inicial en el McDonald’s —entre ellos un cargador, un pasaporte, una cartera, un teléfono celular y un chip de computadora— serán excluidos.

Si bien los agentes de policía afirmaron que registraron la bolsa en parte por temor a que contuviera un arma, Carro determinó que dicha justificación no se sostenía tras un análisis minucioso.

“Sin embargo, si bien las imágenes de las cámaras corporales mostraron que los agentes expresaron su preocupación en el lugar de los hechos de que la mochila pudiera contener una bomba, no había pruebas de que existiera un arma de fuego ni de que esta fuera la razón del registro”, escribió el juez. “Pero incluso si hubiera sido una preocupación legítima, en el momento del registro no existía la posibilidad de que el acusado sacara un arma de la mochila, y por lo tanto, no había ninguna urgencia”.

Los abogados defensores de Mangione habían presionado para que el contenido de la mochila fuera excluido del caso por la fiscalía, alegando que fue registrada ilegalmente, sin una orden judicial.

Los fiscales de la Oficina del Fiscal de Distrito de Manhattan negaron las alegaciones de la defensa e insistieron en que los registros fueron legales y apropiados.

El fallo de Carro se produce meses después de una audiencia de supresión de pruebas que duró nueve días e incluyó horas de grabaciones de las cámaras corporales de la policía que mostraban cómo se desarrolló el arresto y el testimonio de varios agentes del orden sobre los registros.

La audiencia de supresión de pruebas permitió al público vislumbrar algunas de las “pruebas muy contundentes” que los fiscales tienen en este caso, según declaró el analista legal de CNN, Joey Jackson.

“Los miembros del jurado podrán escuchar todo sobre ese cuaderno y todas las pruebas que demuestran su intención, cómo identificó lo que estaba haciendo, por qué lo hacía, etcétera”, declaró Jackson. “Verán el arma, el silenciador, y creo que eso les preocupará mucho”.

El caso ha generado un debate nacional y ha puesto de relieve la opinión pública sobre el sistema de salud estadounidense.

Mangione ha recibido numerosas muestras de apoyo

Removing poison — and stigma — from the world’s most dangerous bowl of soup

Kraig Pakulski 0 20 Article rating: No rating

By Lilit Marcus, Erica Hwang, CNN

Busan, South Korea (CNN) — In a 1991 episode of “The Simpsons,” Homer goes to a Japanese restaurant and eats fugu, or poisonous pufferfish. He becomes convinced that he’s going to die, so he crosses off as many of the items on his bucket list as possible.

There’s one wrinkle — the skillful chef managed to remove all the poison, so Homer’s totally fine and has to keep living his life.

Pufferfish, though, still has a dangerous reputation.

Yes, it’s poisonous. Even a tiny amount of the tetrodotoxin it contains can be lethal.

However, the fish can be prepared in a way where the poison is safely removed. In Busan, South Korea’s second-largest city and a major seaside destination, pufferfish restaurants abound.

While seafood is popular all across South Korea, pufferfish is a Busan specialty. The fishermen who have long lived in this part of the country easily catch them in the surrounding waters. The seaside Mipo neighborhood in Busan is known locally as “Pufferfish Village.” Several of Busan’s pufferfish restaurants have been recognized by Michelin, which debuted its Busan guide in 2024.

Pufferfish chefs require special training and need to pass an exam before they’re licensed by a national government department. Nervous diners can ask to see these certificates, which are usually hanging on the wall inside the restaurant, to be sure they’re in safe hands.

One of the most famous pufferfish restaurants in Busan is Chowon Bokguk — bokguk means pufferfish soup in Korean.

Although the restaurant is in an unassuming brick building on a typical side street, it comes with significant prestige: founder Kim Dong-sik was the first licensed pufferfish chef in Busan.

At lunchtime, visitors can order a set menu where the fish is prepared in a soup. The rich broth contains vegetables like bean sprouts, white radishes and water parsley, while deep-fried pufferfish fritters are served as an appetizer.

The meal arrives with a full set of banchan, Korean side dishes, that include two different kinds of kimchi, water spinach and rice. The most basic of these sets costs 18,000 won (about $12).

Soup with a side of scandal

Chowon Bokguk’s reputation, though, goes well beyond its menu offerings. Ask any local Busanite about it, and they’ll tell you that the restaurant was the site of a significant political scandal decades ago.

A group of Busan political officials, including the city’s mayor and police chief, were having a meal at the restaurant in 1992. Unbeknownst to both them and the restaurant’s owners, Chowon Bokguk had been bugged.

It was a classic case of political espionage. Figures linked to the Unification People’s Party eavesdropped on high-ranking government rivals from the Democratic Liberal Party as they plotted to influence presidential elections.

The tapes dropped like a bombshell just three days before the election, causing a major scandal. The “Chowon Bokguk incident” led to a landmark legal case that, ironically, saw members of the Unification Party convicted of trespassing for planting bugs without permission.

Today, Chowon Bokguk is to Busan what Watergate is to Washington D.C., and these days the restaurant prefers to keep a low profile, letting its food do the talking.

The restaurant is popular for workday lunches, with an attendant helping cars maneuver in and out of the small lot in front of the building.

‘A sense of comfortable beauty’

Pufferfish consumption has long roots in South Korea. It was a specialty food for the Joseon dynasty, Korea’s final dynasty, which spanned from the 14th through the early 20th century, but Korean food historian Park Sung-bae believes it was eaten well before that.

Althoug

Starbucks Korea CEO fired after ‘Tank Day’ promo evokes brutal crackdown on democracy

Kraig Pakulski 0 27 Article rating: No rating

Reuters

Seoul (Reuters) — The head of Starbucks Korea has been fired after a marketing campaign sparked public outrage for evoking painful memories of a brutal military crackdown on pro-democracy protesters in 1980.

Shinsegae Group, the retail conglomerate that licenses and manages the US coffee chain in South Korea, said it had sacked Sohn Jeong-hyun, the head of Starbucks Korea, for carrying out “inappropriate marketing.”

Sohn’s dismissal came hours after Starbucks launched its “Tank Day” campaign on Monday promoting what it called its “Tank” line of tumblers with the tagline “put it on the table with a sound of ‘Tak!’”

Monday also marked Democratisation Movement Day, which commemorates the student-led Gwangju Uprising of May 1980, and the campaign drew strong criticism in South Korea.

Hundreds of people are estimated to have died or gone missing when the military dictatorship of Chun Doo-hwan deployed troops and tanks to crack down on the protests. Many details remain unconfirmed, including who gave the order to open fire on the protesters. Chun finally stepped down in 1988 amid growing calls for democracy.

Critics also questioned the use of the phrase “tak” for echoing explanations by South Korean police in 1987 for the death of a student protester, who was found to have been tortured. At the time, police said the student died after investigators struck a desk making a “tak” sound, according to local media reports.

Reuters was unable to reach Sohn for comment and Starbucks Korea declined to make him available for comment, saying he had already left the company. The company has withdrawn the campaign.

Companies apologize

Writing on X on Monday, South Korean President Lee Jae Myung said he was “enraged” by Starbucks’ campaign and demanded it apologize to families of people killed during the uprising.

The campaign “tarnished the bloody protests of Gwangju citizens and the victims of the protests,” Lee said, calling it the act of a “degenerate peddler.”

Starbucks Korea posted a statement on its website apologizing for the promotion while Shinsegae Group Chairman Chung Yong-jin also issued a public apology.

“I deeply bow in apology as the representative of the group,” Chung said. The marketing “deeply hurt the public, the bereaved families, and the victims of the May 18 demonstration.”

Shares of Shinsegae’s discount retail chain E-Mart 139480.KS, which owns a 67.5% stake in Starbucks Korea that is now called SCK Company, ended down 5.5% at the close of trade in Seoul.

Starbucks Global also issued a statement on Tuesday, saying it was sorry about what had happened and that an investigation had begun.

“We sincerely apologize to the people of Gwangju, to those impacted by this tragedy, and to our customers and communities,” a spokesperson at Starbucks Global said in an email to Reuters.

“Leadership accountability actions have been taken, and a thorough investigation is underway,” the spokesperson said. “We are implementing stronger internal controls, review standards, and company-wide training to ensure this does not happen again.”

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

The post Starbucks Korea CEO fired after ‘Tank Day’ promo evokes brutal crackdown on democracy appeared first on News Channel 3-12.

What previous Super El Niños can tell us about the next one

Kraig Pakulski 0 22 Article rating: No rating

By Andrew Freedman, CNN

(CNN) — The coming “Super” El Niño is poised to affect the lives of hundreds of millions of people worldwide as it strengthens through the year into the winter season. It may also alter ecosystems for decades to come, judging from the repercussions of past intense El Niños.

The last Super El Niño reshaped weather and economies around the world, leaving disruptions that lingered long after the Pacific cooled. Now, as another powerful El Niño builds, we’re looking for clues about what hundreds of millions of people — and the planet’s most fragile ecosystems — may face next.

El Niño is a naturally occurring weather cycle in the Pacific Ocean characterized by unusually hot waters near the equator, which changes the circulation of air in the atmosphere. But the effects of El Niño do not stay limited to that part of the Pacific; they ricochet outward to affect weather and climate patterns around the globe.

Past Super El Niños are an imperfect guide to this upcoming one, since no two El Niños are alike in their impact. But in many ways, we will be simultaneously more and less resilient to effects of this super El Niño compared to events in 1982-83, 1997-98 and 2015-16.

Most notably, some computer models show the upcoming El Niño exceeding the intensity of all those events to become the most intense since at least 1950. It’s not the most likely scenario, but that’s the biggest point of uncertainty in its impacts: We aren’t going to know its peak strength until it happens.

Our modern resilience comes from being able to see El Niño coming well before its worst effects hit. But there are some concerns that countries and aid groups may have a harder time mounting a response to El Niño-linked extreme weather events because of cuts to aid budgets and other political developments. These have especially affected some of the most vulnerable countries in the world.

The effects of a strong El Niño can include flooding in some areas while drought, heat waves and wildfires plague other regions. Crop losses are common in some countries during an El Niño, as is coral bleaching and mortality due to unusually hot ocean temperatures.

Because El Niño features a large area of unusually hot ocean waters, with much of that heat transferred to the atmosphere, the global climate is almost certain to see a record warm year during an intense El Niño, climate scientists say.

Takeaway 1: It will be costly

Studies of historical El Niño events, particularly the “El Niño of the Century” in 1997-98, have shown that their economic damage can run into the trillions globally, though some countries can benefit economically from the milder winters it brings or other weather pattern shifts.

A study published in the journal Science in 2023 found that El Niño can cut country-level economic growth for several years after the warm waters have subsided.

Researchers attributed $4.1 trillion in global income losses to the 1982-83 El Niño and $5.7 trillion in global income losses to the 1997-98 event, which, based on its intensity, may be a useful analog for the upcoming El Niño. These losses played out in countries across a five-year period during and following the El Niño.

Takeaway 2: El Niño isn’t the only game in town

During El Niño, and especially a Super El Niño, it can be tempting to blame each extreme weather event on the phenomenon. However, El Niño does not instigate individual weather systems so much as dial up or down the odds for particular conditions to prevail at a certain time of the year.

To put it plainly, there is no foreboding El N

RSS
First831832833834836838839840Last