Santa Barbara County News and Events

Wind Advisory issued February 18 at 2:46AM PST until February 18 at 6:00AM PST by NWS Los Angeles/Oxnard CA

Kraig Pakulski 0 19 Article rating: No rating

* WHAT…Southwest winds 25 to 35 mph with gusts up to 50 mph
expected.

* WHERE…A portion of southwest California.

* WHEN…Until 6 AM PST early this morning.

* IMPACTS…Gusty winds will blow around unsecured objects. Tree
limbs could be blown down and a few power outages may result.
Winds this strong can make driving difficult, especially for high
profile vehicles. Use extra caution.

The post Wind Advisory issued February 18 at 2:46AM PST until February 18 at 6:00AM PST by NWS Los Angeles/Oxnard CA appeared first on News Channel 3-12.

Mark Zuckerberg testificará en juicio por adicción a las redes sociales

Kraig Pakulski 0 15 Article rating: No rating

Por Clare Duffy

Mark Zuckerberg se dispone a testificar el miércoles por primera vez ante un jurado sobre las acusaciones de que sus plataformas de redes sociales perjudicaron a niños y adolescentes.

El testimonio de Zuckerberg como testigo en un juicio histórico por adicción a las redes sociales le dará al CEO de Meta la oportunidad de defender los esfuerzos que la compañía dice haber realizado para proteger a los usuarios jóvenes.

Padres que afirman que sus hijos sufrieron daños o fallecieron a causa de las redes sociales viajan desde todo el país para asistir. Afirman que la audiencia marca un momento crucial de rendición de cuentas para Meta tras años de preocupación por la seguridad juvenil en sus plataformas de Facebook e Instagram.

Meta, así como YouTube, están acusados ​​de diseñar intencionalmente funciones adictivas que engancharon a una mujer de 20 años cuando era niña y perjudicaron su salud mental. La demanda interpuesta por la joven, identificada por su abogado como “Kaley”, y su madre es la primera de más de 1500 demandas similares que llegan a juicio.

Kaley empezó a usar YouTube a los 6 años e Instagram a los 9, según su abogado, Mark Lanier. A veces usaba Instagram “varias horas al día”, afirmó, y en una ocasión estuvo en la plataforma más de 16 horas en un solo día, a pesar de los intentos de su madre por frenar su uso. Kaley afirma que las características adictivas de la aplicación la llevaron a desarrollar ansiedad, dismorfia corporal y pensamientos suicidas, y que sufrió acoso y sextorsión en Instagram.

Un portavoz de Meta declaró: “Discrepamos rotundamente con las acusaciones de la demanda de Kaley y confiamos en que las pruebas demostrarán nuestro compromiso de larga data con el apoyo a los jóvenes”. El abogado de la compañía argumentó que fue la difícil vida familiar de Kaley, y no las redes sociales, la causa de sus problemas de salud mental. YouTube también niega las acusaciones de la demanda.

“La pregunta para el jurado en Los Ángeles es si Instagram fue un factor sustancial en los problemas de salud mental de la demandante”, declaró un portavoz de Meta en un comunicado previo al testimonio de Zuckerberg. “Las pruebas demostrarán que enfrentó muchos desafíos importantes y difíciles mucho antes de usar las redes sociales”.

Meta ha señalado funciones de seguridad, como herramientas de supervisión parental y “cuentas para adolescentes”, que implementan configuraciones de privacidad predeterminadas y restricciones de contenido para usuarios menores de 18 años.

Se espera que Zuckerberg enfrente preguntas sobre lo que Meta sabía sobre los riesgos de sus plataformas para los usuarios jóvenes y si esas características de seguridad fueron suficientes para mitigarlos.

“Estoy segura de que hablará de que tiene hijos y de que esto es muy importante para él… Creo que simplemente hablará de todo lo que están haciendo para que parezca que ‘hacemos lo mejor que podemos’”, declaró a CNN Kimberly Pallen, socia del bufete Withers, especializada en litigios civiles complejos. “Probablemente se reduzca a eso: desde la perspectiva del jurado, ¿están haciendo lo suficiente? ¿Y les importa?”

El desempeño de Zuckerberg en el estrado también podría jugar un papel importante en cómo el jurado ve el caso, dijo Pallen.

“Todo dependerá de cómo testifiquen estas personas ante el jurado, si le agradan al jurado y de lo que muestren los documentos”, dijo.

Es probable que también le pregunten a Zuckerberg (como le preguntaron al jefe de Instagram, Adam Mosseri, durante su propio testimonio la semana pasada) si prior

A late-night monologue, a shocking suspension – and a reinstatement. Jimmy Kimmel’s still taking risks

Kraig Pakulski 0 25 Article rating: No rating

By Dan Heching, CNN

(CNN) — In September of last year, late-night television host Jimmy Kimmel found himself thrust into the spotlight — one that reached far beyond his studio stage.

The late-night scene was already in upheaval after CBS abruptly canceled Stephen Colbert’s show that summer, a move that sent shockwaves through the industry and fueled speculation about the future of the long-standing comedy format.

So when Kimmel’s comments connected to the alleged killer of conservative activist Charlie Kirk went viral for all the wrong reasons, the risks were even higher than usual.

As outrage on the right flared all the way up to the White House, the host and his staff received a barrage of threats, with their personal information doxxed. An administration official threatened to revoke ABC affiliate licenses. Just hours later, ABC suspended Kimmel’s show “indefinitely.”

It was a moment that even Kimmel himself would later admit his show might not have survived. “I was like, I’m never coming back on the air,” he later said. But he was wrong – he did come back.

‘The easy way or the hard way’

In the days following Kirk’s assassination, Kimmel – no stranger to stirring the pot with pointed political humor – focused on perceptions around the alleged killer, saying “the MAGA Gang (was) desperately trying to characterize this kid” as “anything other than one of them.”

Kimmel also mocked President Donald Trump for talking about the White House East Wing renovation when a member of the press asked him how he was personally coping with Kirk’s death.

The funnyman again discussed the politicization of Kirk’s assassination on the following night’s show, saying “many in MAGA-land are working very hard to capitalize on the murder of Charlie Kirk.”

As a growing chorus of right-wing media pundits took issue, conservative podcaster Benny Johnson had Brendan Carr, head of the Federal Communications Commission, on his show to address the situation.

Carr, whose agency licenses local TV stations across the country, said the matter could be handled “the easy way or the hard way” for ABC and parent company Disney.

Just hours later, station group owners Nexstar and Sinclair said they would no longer be airing Kimmel’s show in their respective markets. Shortly after, ABC announced it was removing the program from the air entirely, saying “Jimmy Kimmel Live will be pre-empted indefinitely.”

From primetime to preemption

The move to take Kimmel off the air sparked a firestorm, with critics blasting the FCC for overreach and encroachment on free speech, especially since Nexstar was in the process of seeking FCC approval for a proposed merger with another station group owner, Tegna.

The suspension even caused a consumer boycott of Disney+ and Hulu, streaming platforms that are part of Disney’s portfolio.

Speaking with CNN’s Erin Burnett after Kimmel’s show was taken off the air, the lone Democrat-aligned FCC commissioner, Anna Gomez, said, “the First Amendment does not allow us, the FCC, to tell broadcasters what they can broadcast.”

“I saw the clip. He did not make any unfounded claims, but he did make a joke, one that others may even find crude, but that is neither illegal nor grounds for companies to capitulate to this administration in ways that violate the First Amendment,” Gomez told CNN. “This sets a dangero

Electability and enthusiasm: How the Texas Senate primaries are testing the direction of both parties

Kraig Pakulski 0 20 Article rating: No rating

By Arlette Saenz, CNN

(CNN) — In Texas, a pair of US Senate primaries set for next month have emerged as an early gauge of where the energy is in both political parties and sparked a sharp debate over what it will take to win the reliably Republican state in November.

With early voting now underway, the results of the closely watched and increasingly expensive primaries stand to shape how Democrats and Republicans view the potential competitiveness of the general election contest in Texas as the GOP seeks to maintain control of its 53-seat majority in the chamber.

First, the party must select a nominee. Republicans are engaged in a three-way battle between an incumbent senator fighting for political survival, a state attorney general who’s defied odds amid a series of scandals, and a lesser-known US congressman pushing for generational change. Looming over the GOP face-off is President Donald Trump, who has refrained from offering an endorsement of four-term Sen. John Cornyn despite pleas from senior leaders in his party.

Meanwhile, the Democratic contest features two rising stars in Texas politics – both showcasing vast digital reach but offering differing theories on how the party can win in a deeply conservative state where no Democrat has won statewide since 1994.

The fault lines in each party’s primary were on display as early voting kicked off on Tuesday. Campaigning at a Mexican restaurant in Austin, Cornyn warned of repercussions if one of his opponents – state Attorney General Ken Paxton – wins the Republican nomination.

“We will have an election day massacre,” said Cornyn. “If Ken Paxton is at the top of the ticket, we risk losing the Senate seat, losing the majority in the House of Representatives, and it will take a toll on everybody in the ballot.”

Concerns about Paxton’s electability have run throughout the primary race with top Republicans fretting his political, legal and personal baggage could put the Senate seat in jeopardy. Some senior Republicans fear it could cost the party $200 million to defend the seat if Paxton emerges as the nominee.

Despite some GOP misgivings, Paxton has seen sustained support from elements of the president’s MAGA base. He earned the endorsement of Turning Point Action, an affiliate of the influential conservative non-profit Turning Point USA founded by the late political activist Charlie Kirk.

Public polling in the Texas Senate primaries has been limited, but a recent University of Houston Hobby School poll showed Paxton in the lead with 38% support among likely GOP primary voters, compared to 31% for Cornyn and Rep. Wesley Hunt at 17%. A sizable slice of voters – 12% – said they were undecided.

“He has adopted the Washington mentality, the Washington swamp, and he is not one of us,” Paxton said of Cornyn as he campaigned in Allen, Texas Tuesday. “It is time, no matter what, for John Cornyn to come home, and we’re gonna beat him in 2 weeks.”

Hunt, a Houston-area congressman, has tried to draw a generational contrast with Cornyn, even highlighting the divide in a closing ad of his campaign.

“In 2004 I graduated from West point and joined the army. By then, John Cornyn had already been a politician for 20 years,” Hunt said in an ad released as early voting began.

Cornyn and his allies have knocked Hunt in recent weeks for missing votes in the US House where House Speaker Mike Johnson is operating with a razor-thin majority.

The split GOP field could result in no candidate is clearing the 50% benchmark to avoid a late May runoff between the top

Mark Zuckerberg to testify in social media addiction trial

Kraig Pakulski 0 27 Article rating: No rating

By Clare Duffy, CNN

New York (CNN) — Mark Zuckerberg is set to take the stand Wednesday to testify for the first time before a jury about claims that his social media platforms harmed children and teens.

Zuckerberg’s witness testimony in a landmark social media addiction trial will give the Meta chief executive a chance to defend the efforts the company says it has taken to protect young users.

Parents who say their children were harmed or died as a result of social media are traveling from around the country to attend. They say the hearing marks a crucial moment of accountability for Meta following years of concerns about youth safety on its platforms Facebook and Instagram.

Meta, as well as YouTube, are accused of intentionally designing addictive features that hooked a now-20-year-old woman as a child and harmed her mental health. The lawsuit brought by the young woman, identified by her lawyer as “Kaley,” and her mother is the first of more than 1,500 similar lawsuits to go to trial.

Kaley began using YouTube at the age of 6 and Instagram at 9, according to her lawyer, Mark Lanier. She sometimes used Instagram for “several hours a day,” he said, and was once on the platform for more than 16 hours in a single day, despite her mother’s attempts to curb her use. Kaley claims the app’s addictive features led her to develop anxiety, body dysmorphia and suicidal thoughts and that she experienced bullying and sextortion on Instagram.

A Meta spokesperson has said “we strongly disagree” with the allegations in Kaley’s lawsuit and “are confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people.” The company’s lawyer has argued that it was Kaley’s difficult family life, rather than social media, that caused her mental health challenges. YouTube also denies the lawsuit’s claims.

“The question for the jury in Los Angeles is whether Instagram was a substantial factor in the plaintiff’s mental health struggles,” a Meta spokesperson said in a statement ahead of Zuckerberg’s testimony. “The evidence will show she faced many significant, difficult challenges well before she ever used social media.”

Meta has pointed to safety features, such as parental oversight tools and “teen accounts,” which implement default privacy settings and content restrictions for users under the age of 18.

Zuckerberg is expected to face questions about what Meta has known about the risks of its platforms for young users, and whether those safety features were sufficient to mitigate them.

“I’m sure he’s going to talk about the fact that he has children and this is really important to him… I think he’s going to just talk about everything that they’re doing to make it seem like ‘we’re doing the best we can,’” Kimberly Pallen, a partner at the law firm Withers who specializes in complex civil litigation, told CNN. “That’s probably what it’s going to come down to: From the jury’s perspective, are they doing enough? And do they care?”

Zuckerberg’s performance on the stand could also play a significant role in how the jury views the case, Pallen said.

“It’s going to turn on how these people testify in front of the jury, if the jury likes them, and what the documents show,” she said.

Zuckerberg is also likely to be asked — as Instagram chief Adam Mosseri was during his own testimony last week — whether he prioritized earning profits over youth safety with his product decisions, as Kaley alleges.

“Internal documents show that Meta understood the dangers its platforms posed to young people

RSS
First29542955295629572959296129622963Last