Santa Barbara County News and Events

El Pentágono compró dispositivo en operación encubierta que investigadores sospechan está vinculado al Síndrome de La Habana

Kraig Pakulski 0 21 Article rating: No rating

Por Katie Bo Lillis, Natasha Bertrand, Priscilla Álvarez, Jim Sciutto y Zachary Cohen, CNN

El Departamento de Defensa ha pasado más de un año probando un dispositivo comprado en una operación encubierta que algunos investigadores creen que podría ser la causa de una serie de misteriosas dolencias que afectan a espías, diplomáticos y tropas estadounidenses y que se conocen coloquialmente como Síndrome de La Habana, según cuatro fuentes informadas sobre el asunto.

Una división del Departamento de Seguridad Nacional, Investigaciones de Seguridad Nacional, adquirió el aparato por millones de dólares en los últimos días de la administración Biden, con fondos del Departamento de Defensa, según dos de las fuentes.

Los funcionarios pagaron cantidades millonarias por el dispositivo, aseguraron estas personas, que se negaron a proporcionar una cifra más específica.

El dispositivo aún se encuentra en estudio y existe un debate en curso (y en algunos sectores del Gobierno, escepticismo) sobre su vínculo con las aproximadamente docenas de incidentes de salud anómalos que permanecen oficialmente sin explicación.

CNN solicitó comentarios al Pentágono, al Departamento de Investigaciones de Seguridad Nacional (HSI, por sus siglas en inglés) y al Departamento de Seguridad Nacional (DHS, por sus siglas en inglés). La CIA se negó a hacer comentarios.

El dispositivo adquirido por HSI produce ondas de radio pulsadas, según una de las fuentes, lo que algunos funcionarios y académicos han especulado durante años sobre la posible causa de los incidentes. Si bien el dispositivo no es de origen exclusivamente ruso, contiene componentes rusos, añadió esta fuente.

Las autoridades llevan mucho tiempo intentando comprender cómo un dispositivo lo suficientemente potente como para causar el tipo de daño que han denunciado algunas víctimas podría hacerse portátil. Esa sigue siendo una pregunta clave, según una de las fuentes informadas sobre el equipo, que podría caber en una mochila, afirmó esta persona.

La adquisición del dispositivo ha reavivado un doloroso y polémico debate dentro del gobierno estadounidense sobre el Síndrome de La Habana, conocido oficialmente como “episodios de salud anómalos”.

La misteriosa enfermedad surgió por primera vez a finales de 2016, cuando un grupo de diplomáticos estadounidenses destinados en La Habana, la capital cubana, comenzó a reportar síntomas compatibles con un traumatismo craneoencefálico, como vértigo y fuertes dolores de cabeza. En los años siguientes, se han reportado casos en todo el mundo.

En la década siguiente, la comunidad de inteligencia y el Departamento de Defensa han tratado de entender si esos funcionarios fueron víctimas de algún tipo de ataque energético dirigido por un Gobierno extranjero.

Altos funcionarios de inteligencia dijeron públicamente que no había suficiente evidencia para apoyar esa conclusión y las víctimas argumentaron que el Gobierno de Estados Unidos los había engañado e ignorado evidencia importante de que Rusia estaba atacando a funcionarios estadounidenses.

Aun así, los funcionarios de defensa consideraron que sus hallazgos eran lo suficientemente graves como para informar a las comisiones de Inteligencia de la Cámara de Representantes y el Senado a fines del año pasado, incluida una referencia al dispositivo adquirido y sus pruebas.

Una preocupación clave ahora para algunos funcionarios es que si la tecnología resulta viable, puede haber proliferado, dijeron varias de las fuentes, lo que significa que más de un país podría tener ahora acceso a un dispositivo que podría ser capaz de causar lesiones que pongan fin a las carreras de funcionarios estadounidenses.

CNN no pudo averiguar dónde ni a quién compró el dispositivo el Gobierno, pero HSI tiene un historial de colab

Por qué los disturbios en Irán podrían poner a prueba a la República Islámica como nunca antes

Kraig Pakulski 0 27 Article rating: No rating

Análisis por Brett H. McGurk, CNN

Hace años, negociaba con funcionarios iraníes la liberación de rehenes estadounidenses retenidos en Teherán. Las conversaciones no iban bien.

En un momento dado, mi homólogo iraní preguntó por qué Irán debería llegar a un acuerdo con un país que cambia constantemente de Gobierno, es decir, una democracia.

Respondí con una pregunta propia. ¿Cuánto tiempo puede esperar mantenerse en el poder un país que toma rehenes y reprime a su propio pueblo con violencia? La historia demuestra que tales sistemas colapsan, e Irán seguramente no será la excepción.

Su respuesta fue escalofriante. El régimen contaba con el apoyo de una masa crítica de la población y, lo que era más importante, en su opinión, tenía las armas y la disposición para usarlas.

Durante la última década, Irán ha demostrado repetidamente este punto.

Las protestas nacionales de 2017, 2018, 2019 y, de forma más dramática, la de 2022, fueron reprimidas con fuerza.

En cada ocasión, el régimen sobrevivió recurriendo a la misma táctica sombría: negar legitimidad a los manifestantes, culpar a enemigos extranjeros, cortar las comunicaciones y desplegar las fuerzas de seguridad.

Hoy, los iraníes vuelven a las calles. Y, una vez más, el régimen parece responder como siempre: con violencia brutal. ¿Podría ser diferente el resultado esta vez?

En septiembre de 2022, estallaron protestas en todo Irán después de que Mahsa Amini, una joven kurda iraní de 22 años, fuera detenida por la policía moral por presuntamente violar el estricto código de vestimenta del país y mostrar su cabello.

Murió bajo custodia. La muerte de Mahsa desencadenó un levantamiento nacional no solo contra las leyes obligatorias del hiyab, sino contra la propia República Islámica.

Estados Unidos y sus aliados apoyaron públicamente a los manifestantes.

El gobierno de Biden tomó medidas para ampliar el acceso a los servicios de internet, incluyendo la conectividad satelital y las redes privadas virtuales.

El Congreso aprobó la Ley Mahsa Amini de Derechos Humanos y Responsabilidad y se impusieron nuevas sanciones a funcionarios e instituciones iraníes implicados en la represión

Nada de esto fue suficiente. Según una investigación posterior de las Naciones Unidas, las fuerzas de seguridad iraníes mataron a más de 500 personas y detuvieron a unas 20.000 durante la represión.

Las protestas fueron finalmente sofocadas por meses de violencia, miedo y agotamiento.

Según informes, las protestas actuales comenzaron en el Gran Bazar de Irán y sus alrededores, históricamente el corazón de la clase comerciante iraní. Esto es importante. Los disturbios que llevaron a la revolución iraní de 1979 comenzaron allí.

Los comerciantes iraníes no son revolucionarios; prefieren la estabilidad del orden a la incertidumbre de los cambios rápidos. Pero el desgobierno económico iraní, con una inflación del 50 %, junto con una crisis en los servicios básicos, ha forjado agravios económicos y antiguas demandas políticas y morales de un cambio de régimen.

Las protestas que estallaron en Teherán se extendieron rápidamente a todo el país y, según se informa, ahora están presentes en las 31 provincias de Irán.

El Líder Supremo Jamenei respondió al decimotercer día de disturbios con la retórica habitual, calificando a los manifestantes de mercenarios de potencias extranjeras y enemigos del Estado.

El lenguaje insinuó que podría producirse una represión, como ocurrió en 2022. El fin de semana pasado, el país se encontraba en un apagón de comunicaciones y surgieron nuevame

Department of Homeland Security changes story of Maryland ICE shooting after local police release contradicting details

Kraig Pakulski 0 33 Article rating: No rating

By Karina Tsui, CNN

(CNN) — The Department of Homeland Security has altered its account of an immigration enforcement-related shooting in a Baltimore suburb on Christmas Eve after details in its initial statement were contradicted by local police.

On December 24, DHS issued a statement saying Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers “defensively fired” at a van occupied by two undocumented immigrants during an enforcement operation in Glen Burnie, Maryland, after the driver rammed ICE vehicles while trying to flee and “then drove his van directly at ICE officers, attempting to run them over.”

The driver was shot and wounded, and the passenger was injured when the van crashed seconds later, according to the original statement from DHS.

The department now says the injured man was not in the van but “was a passenger in one of the ICE vehicles that was rammed,” according to a new statement to CNN from DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin.

The changed account comes as DHS faces increased scrutiny over the fatal shooting of a Minneapolis woman by an ICE agent last week – and more broadly over the veracity of the information the department puts forward regarding federal officers’ actions while carrying out President Donald Trump’s nationwide immigration crackdown.

The new detail in the Maryland ICE shooting was first announced Thursday by the Anne Arundel County Police Department, which is investigating the incident.

“To clarify preliminary information released publicly on the shooting involving ICE agents in Glen Burnie, Maryland, on December 24, 2025: one ICE detainee who was injured during the incident was already in custody in an ICE vehicle, and the other individual injured was struck by gunfire while operating a separate vehicle,” the police department said.

Anne Arundel County police said their investigation into the incident is ongoing and emphasized that its officers do not enforce immigration law or conduct ICE operations.

The ICE officers were conducting “a targeted immigration enforcement operation” in Glen Burnie when they confronted the van, McLaughlin said.

The two undocumented migrants were identified as Tiago Alexandre Sousa-Martins, a Portuguese man who was driving the van, and Salvadoran national Solomon Antonio Serrano-Esquivel, the man authorities now say was in an ICE vehicle.

Officers approached the van and asked Sousa-Martins to turn off the engine, but he refused and attempted to leave the scene, ramming ICE vehicles, and “then (driving) his van directly at ICE officers,” McLaughlin said.

“Fearing for their lives and public safety, officers defensively fired their service weapons, striking the driver,” she said.

Sousa-Martins then wrecked his car between two buildings, McLaughlin said, although photos posted by DHS on X on the day of the incident show a white van crashed into a tree. DHS has not responded to CNN’s request for clarification on that detail.

Officers immediately gave medical care to the two men and took them to t

Department of Homeland Security changes story of Maryland ICE shooting after local police release contradicting details

Kraig Pakulski 0 21 Article rating: No rating

By Karina Tsui, CNN

(CNN) — The Department of Homeland Security has altered its account of an immigration enforcement-related shooting in a Baltimore suburb on Christmas Eve after details in its initial statement were contradicted by local police.

On December 24, DHS issued a statement saying Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers “defensively fired” at a van occupied by two undocumented immigrants during an enforcement operation in Glen Burnie, Maryland, after the driver rammed ICE vehicles while trying to flee and “then drove his van directly at ICE officers, attempting to run them over.”

The driver was shot and wounded, and the passenger was injured when the van crashed seconds later, according to the original statement from DHS.

The department now says the injured man was not in the van but “was a passenger in one of the ICE vehicles that was rammed,” according to a new statement to CNN from DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin.

The changed account comes as DHS faces increased scrutiny over the fatal shooting of a Minneapolis woman by an ICE agent last week – and more broadly over the veracity of the information the department puts forward regarding federal officers’ actions while carrying out President Donald Trump’s nationwide immigration crackdown.

The new detail in the Maryland ICE shooting was first announced Thursday by the Anne Arundel County Police Department, which is investigating the incident.

“To clarify preliminary information released publicly on the shooting involving ICE agents in Glen Burnie, Maryland, on December 24, 2025: one ICE detainee who was injured during the incident was already in custody in an ICE vehicle, and the other individual injured was struck by gunfire while operating a separate vehicle,” the police department said.

Anne Arundel County police said their investigation into the incident is ongoing and emphasized that its officers do not enforce immigration law or conduct ICE operations.

The ICE officers were conducting “a targeted immigration enforcement operation” in Glen Burnie when they confronted the van, McLaughlin said.

The two undocumented migrants were identified as Tiago Alexandre Sousa-Martins, a Portuguese man who was driving the van, and Salvadoran national Solomon Antonio Serrano-Esquivel, the man authorities now say was in an ICE vehicle.

Officers approached the van and asked Sousa-Martins to turn off the engine, but he refused and attempted to leave the scene, ramming ICE vehicles, and “then (driving) his van directly at ICE officers,” McLaughlin said.

“Fearing for their lives and public safety, officers defensively fired their service weapons, striking the driver,” she said.

Sousa-Martins then wrecked his car between two buildings, McLaughlin said, although photos posted by DHS on X on the day of the incident show a white van crashed into a tree. DHS has not responded to CNN’s request for clarification on that detail.

Officers immediately gave medical care to the two men and took them to t

Minnesota and Illinois are suing the Trump administration over immigration operations. Here are the lawsuits’ key claims

Kraig Pakulski 0 24 Article rating: No rating

By Danya Gainor, Taylor Romine, CNN

(CNN) — Minnesota and Illinois separately filed lawsuits Monday against the Trump administration, arguing the president’s immigration crackdown is terrorizing their communities and violating the Constitution.

“We have watched in horror as unchecked federal agents have aggressively assaulted and terrorized our communities and neighborhoods in Illinois, undermining Constitutional rights and threatening public safety,” said Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker.

Chicago as well as Minneapolis and Saint Paul also sued the Trump administration.

The federal government has stepped up operations in Chicago and the Twin Cities, both Democratic strongholds, during the fall and local officials have criticized them for sowing chaos and confusion. An ICE-involved shooting last week in Minneapolis left a mother of three dead and kickstarted a series of nationwide protests.

Both Minnesota and Illinois are asking for an injunction to halt the immigration operations in their states.

The suits were filed against the Department of Homeland Security and Secretary Kristi Noem, as well as reporting agencies, including ICE, US Customs and Border Protection and US Border Patrol.

DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said the Constitution was on the administration’s side. The surge of federal officers, she said in a statement Monday in response to the lawsuits, was needed because sanctuary politicians in Illinois and Minnesota were not protecting their citizens.

Here are the key claims from both lawsuits.

Suits claim unprecedented immigration operations violated 10th Amendment

Both lawsuits invoke the 10th Amendment to defend their states’ rights, alleging the Trump administration has commandeered local resources for its crackdown on immigration in Minnesota and Illinois.

The “unlawful and violent tactics, have disrupted the lives and undermined the liberties and property rights of the people,” and have prevented Illinois and Chicago from enacting the policy their citizens want, their lawsuit said,

Minnesota’s suit specifically emphasized strains on local police resources. The complaint asserts that Minneapolis and Saint Paul have been forced to divert officers from their usual duties to respond to incidents involving federal immigration enforcement, undermining local efforts to protect the community.

The deployment of “armed, masked, and poorly trained federal agents” is a federal invasion, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison said Monday.

CNN reported early last week about 2,000 more federal agents would be sent to Minneapolis. That number, Minnesota’s lawsuit said, “greatly exceeds the number of sworn police officers that Minneapolis and Saint Paul have, combined.”

Minneapolis police officers have worked thousands of combined overtime hours as a direct result of federal agents’ presence, the suit said, costing the city over $2 million in overtime pay.

Political retaliation by Trump motivated immigration crackdown, states say

Minnesota’s lawsuit claims Operation Metro Surge, the immigration crackdown effort in the Twin Cities, is not a legitimate law enforcement action, but the result of a desire to “retaliate” against the Democratic-led state.

The complaint details disparaging statements about the state President Donald Trump has made, saying it shows a clear intention to punish political opponents and jurisdictions with sanctuary policies that limit cooperation with the federal government during immigration efforts.

Illinois’s lawsuit made a similar claim, saying Trump and his administration “have long directed threatening an

RSS
First37653766376737683770377237733774Last