CARPINTERIA, Calif. (KEYT) - Residents in Carpinteria are asked to be on alert for anything suspicious that may be connected to a major crime scene and car crash in the early morning hours.

There were several locations under investigation for hours following an early morning robbery, including farm fields and a cannabis growing site.

The Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Department says patrol units are still in the area seeking armed suspects. A message via X on line says:

Shelter in place and request to avoid the area has been lifted, however additional suspects remain outstanding and should be considered armed. Community members are encouraged to call 911 if they see anyone suspicious. Deputies will remain in the area.

It has not further details about the incident.

A search involved a Sheriff's helicopter, a drone unit, a K9 and multiple Sheriff's deputies, detectives and CHP officers took place before dawn this morning. One of the main areas is along Foothill Road around Cravens Lane, Via Real and Santa Monica Road.

(More details, photos and video will be added here later today.)

The Latest Breaking News, Weather Alerts, Sports and More Anytime On Our Mobile Apps. Keep Up With the Latest Articles by Signing Up for the News Channel 3-12 Newsletter.

The post Carpinteria Residents on Alert With Armed Suspects on the Run appeared first on News Channel 3-12.

SANTA BARBARA, Calif. (KEYT) - If you have noticed the full moon the last couple of nights, with it this month comes another round of king tides.

These are some of the highest tides of the year. Tuesday, there was also a push from the ocean swells, sending waves pounding into the breakwater wall in Santa Barbara.

Those on a walk there had to dodge the big spray of water that splashed over.

There were also many areas that saw the tide push well up on the beaches and in some cases into the coastal parking lots.

That included near the yacht club in Santa Barbara. No damage was reported and a newer rock wall in place has been a solid protection.

These waves have been known to have surprises in them and can be dangerous if you are too close during the peak activity which was in the mid-morning hours.

The Latest Breaking News, Weather Alerts, Sports and More Anytime On Our Mobile Apps. Keep Up With the Latest Articles by Signing Up for the News Channel 3-12 Newsletter.

The post Another Round of King Tides Crash into the Coast appeared first on News Channel 3-12.

By Daniel Dale, CNN

(CNN) — President Donald Trump has promoted dozens of different lies about American elections. Some of them are relatively sophisticated. Some are transparently silly.

House Speaker Mike Johnson is now promoting one of the very most laughable.

In an interview that aired Monday, Trump said Republicans should “take over the voting” in at least “15 places” because of supposed corruption he has shown no evidence of. Then Johnson told reporters Tuesday:

“In some of the states – like in California, for example. I mean, they hold the elections open for weeks after Election Day. That’s just one thing that bothers so many people. We had three House Republican candidates who were ahead on Election Day in the last election cycle, and every time a new tranche of ballots came in, they just magically whittled away until their leads were lost. And no series of ballots that were counted after Election Day were our candidates ahead on any of those counts. It just – it looks on its face to be fraudulent. Can I prove that? No, because it happened so far upstream.”

Even with Johnson’s un-Trumpian admission that he doesn’t have proof of fraud, this is a lot of nonsense.

A Democrat taking the lead in a vote count is not a sign of fraud

There is nothing magical and nothing fraudulent “on its face” about a Republican having an early lead in a California vote count and then losing that lead as more votes are counted – just as there is nothing magical or fraudulent on its face about a Democrat having an early lead in a vote count in another state and then losing that lead as more votes are counted.

All that happens in both cases is that … legitimate ballots are legitimately counted.

In the presidential swing state of Arizona, mail-in ballots must arrive at elections offices by the time the polls close on Election Day. Because mail-in votes tend to favor Democrats these days, in part because Trump has repeatedly discouraged his supporters from voting this way, Arizona’s Democratic candidates may have illusory big leads when mail-in votes that arrived early are quickly added to the vote totals on Election Night – but they may lose those leads or see them narrow as the votes that are cast in-person or dropped off on Election Day are fully counted over the coming days.

Conversely, California allows mail-in ballots to arrive up to seven days after Election Day as long as they are postmarked on or before Election Day – and the Democratic-dominated state with the country’s largest population has a huge volume of mail-in ballots to count, around 13 million out of roughly 16.1 million votes in the 2024 election. California’s rules for processing mail-in ballots and for mail-in voters fixing issues with t

By John Fritze, CNN

(CNN) — The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed California to use a new congressional map that will undermine President Donald Trump’s effort to keep control of the House of Representatives, marking a defeat for Republicans who claimed one of the new districts was redesigned based on race rather than politics.

There were no noted dissents, and the court did not explain its reasoning.

The emergency appeal from state Republicans was the latest to reach the high court tied to an ongoing arms-race-style mid-decade redistricting that Trump initiated to keep the House after the midterm elections.

California redrew its map, which puts five GOP-held seats in play, as a response to a partisan redistricting in Texas that benefited Republicans.

Federal courts, including the Supreme Court, don’t get involved in cases dealing with partisan gerrymanders. But state Republicans had argued that racial considerations motivated the redrawing of one district that covers portions of the Central Valley between San Francisco and Fresno. Those allegations were based largely on comments by a mapmaking consultant, Paul Mitchell, who said publicly that he intended to “ensure that Latino districts” were “bolstered” in the 13th Congressional District.

The state’s “professed purpose was to pick up five seats in Congress for the Democratic Party to offset the five seats the Republican Party gained in Texas,” California Republicans told the Supreme Court in their emergency appeal. “But those officials harbored another purpose as well: maximizing Latino voting strength to shore up Latino support for the Democratic Party.”

The map was ultimately approved by state residents in a referendum in which 64% of voters backed the plan.

But the Republicans challenging the map faced a seemingly insurmountable hurdle. Just weeks ago, the Supreme Court rejected a strikingly similar argument made by civil rights and other groups challenging Texas’ map. In early December, the court sided with Texas in that challenge, permitting the state’s map to be used in this year’s election.

Justice Samuel Alito, a member of the court’s conservative wing, wrote in a concurrence that it was “indisputable” that the “impetus for the adoption of the Texas map (like the map subsequently adopted in California) was partisan advantage pure and simple.” His opinion was joined by two other conservatives, Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch.

State GOP officials and the state Republican Party sued to block the map’s use and the Trump administration joined that litigation. But the administration declined to bring its own emergency appeal to the Supreme Court and instead filed a brief supporting the state officials’ appeal.

California Republicans had asked the Supreme Court for a decision by February 9 – the start of the state’s candidate filing period. But Gov. Gavin Newsom and other Democratic opponents noted that the justices have long admonished courts not to change state

Por Randi Kaye y Holmes Lybrand, CNN

Tras planear, acechar y esperar el momento adecuado para disparar y matar al entonces presidente Donald Trump, el hombre que instaló un nido de francotirador en el borde del campo de golf de Trump en West Palm Beach, Florida, y fue frustrado por un agente del Servicio Secreto, fue condenado este miércoles a cadena perpetua.

Ryan Routh fue declarado culpable de cinco cargos en septiembre tras un desastroso intento de representarse a sí mismo en el juicio, en el que fue constantemente reprendido por la jueza federal a cargo del caso, Aileen Cannon.

Cannon, quien fue nombrada por Trump durante su primer mandato, sentenció a Routh a cadena perpetua, junto con otras largas condenas, por los cargos, que incluyen intento de asesinato de un importante candidato presidencial.

A Routh se le indicó que permaneciera sentado cuando se dirigió al tribunal, encadenado de manos y pies, vestido con un mono carcelario color beige.

“No hay nada ante usted más que una cáscara vacía de estadounidense”, le dijo Routh al juez. “Lamentablemente, la ejecución no es una opción”.

También habló sobre lo indignado que estaba por las situaciones en Ucrania y Gaza antes de que Cannon lo interrumpiera y dictara la sentencia.

“Su complot para matar es deliberado y malvado a pesar de su fingida tranquilidad”, dijo la jueza. “Demostró su intención de matar”, y agregó, “Casi logró su malvado plan”.

Además de la cadena perpetua, a Routh se le impusieron sentencias adicionales que se cumplirán de manera concurrente: 84 meses por posesión de un arma de fuego durante un crimen violento, 240 meses por ataque a un agente federal, 18 meses por posesión de un arma de fuego siendo un delincuente convicto, y 60 meses por posesión de un arma de fuego con número de serie borrado.

Después de que se leyó la sentencia, cuando Routh fue sacado de la corte, miró a la galería hacia alguien que conocía, le guiñó un ojo y sonrió.

El Departamento de Justicia abogó por una sentencia de cadena perpetua.

El fiscal John Shipley dijo que Routh “no mostró remordimiento” y “se preparó para matar o agredir por la fuerza a cualquiera que se interpusiera en su camino”.

Shipley mostró pruebas presentadas durante el juicio, incluyendo una foto tomada desde el “nido de francotirador” de Routh que mostraba la distancia de solo 126 pies (aproximadamente 38 metros) hasta el sexto green, donde estaba apuntando con su rifle SKS, mientras esperaba a Trump.

Según las pruebas presentadas en el juicio, Routh había estado cerca del campo de golf y de la residencia de Trump en Mar-a-Lago en las semanas previas al intento de asesinato frustrado. Teléfonos desechables utilizados por Routh también mostraron búsquedas como “próximos mítines de Trump” y “cámaras de tráfico de Palm Beach”.

En una carta que los investigadores descubrieron rápidamente, Routh había escrito una confesión de su intento de asesinar a Trump. En la primera página escribió: “Hice lo mejor que pude y puse toda la determinación que pude reunir. Ahora depende de ustedes terminar el trabajo; y ofreceré US$ 150.000 a quien pueda completarlo”.

No hay indicios de que Routh tuviera el dinero para financiar esa oferta.

Armado con un rifle antiguo de estilo soviético y protegido por placas blindadas colgadas sobre la cerca, Routh apuntó al sexto hoyo del campo de golf de Trump el 15 de septiembre de 2024, mientras el presidente jugaba una ronda un hoyo atrás, a solo minutos de distancia.

Un agente del Servicio Secreto, encargado de despejar el área antes del paso de Trump, vio el rostro parcialmente oculto de Routh y el cañón del rifle sobresaliendo a través de la cerca de malla que bordea el campo.

Con el arma apuntándole, el agente disparó varios tiros con su pistola antes de cubrirse detrás de un árbol y comunicar la amenaza por radio.