SANTA BARBARA COUNTY, Calif. - Offshore winds pick up Thursday, clearing our skies as high pressure strengthens.

Breezy winds will also impact parts of SLO and Ventura Counties with wind advisories issued.

We will reach peak heating this week on Friday and Saturday, entering into the low 80s locally - nearing daily records with temperatures 15 degrees above average.

There will be slight cooling on Sunday and Monday because of onshore flow and a brief system in the upper northwest coast - though it will still be warm here in the 60s and 70s.

Another warmup is on tap for next week with dry weather to kick off the first few days of Santa Barbara International Film Festival and no rain chances through Superbowl Sunday.

The post Sunny Thursday, heating up Friday appeared first on News Channel 3-12.

Por Shimon Prokupecz, Holmes Lybrand y Evan Perez, CNN

Los investigadores encargados de la investigación interna de la Oficina de Aduanas y Protección Fronteriza (CBP, por sus siglas en inglés) sobre la muerte de Alex Pretti han tenido acceso limitado a la información y a la evidencia obtenida por la agencia investigativa del Departamento de Seguridad Nacional (HSI, por sus siglas en inglés) y el FBI, dijo a CNN un funcionario de las fuerzas del orden que fue informado sobre el asunto.

De acuerdo con el informe, un agente y un funcionario de la CBP dispararon sus armas reglamentarias durante el incidente, segundos después de que otro agente gritara varias veces: “¡Tiene un arma!”

La investigación interna, liderada por la Oficina de Responsabilidad Profesional de la CBP, envió el primer informe oficial sobre el tiroteo al Congreso el martes.

Sin embargo, el funcionario policial dijo a CNN que la Oficina de Responsabilidad Profesional no ha podido acceder a las pruebas solicitadas al HSI, una agencia que normalmente colabora en estas investigaciones internas, lo que representa una diferencia significativa respecto a investigaciones anteriores.

No obstante, los investigadores pudieron revisar las grabaciones de las cámaras corporales de los agentes involucrados en el incidente antes de enviar el informe inicial al Congreso.

Por separado, tanto en la investigación federal como en la interna de la CBP, autoridades locales afirman que el Departamento de Seguridad Nacional (DHS, por sus siglas en inglés) y el FBI no han compartido ninguna prueba recabada en el caso hasta ahora.

Un juez federal en Minnesota otorgó una orden de restricción temporal que prohíbe a las agencias federales destruir o alterar pruebas relacionadas con el tiroteo.

“Los investigadores federales no han compartido ninguna información con los agentes de la Oficina de Aprehensión Criminal de Minnesota (BCA, por sus siglas en inglés)”, dijo Michael Ernster, portavoz de la BCA, a CNN este miércoles. “Nuestra propia investigación sobre este incidente sigue abierta”.

Tras una llamada con el presidente Donald Trump el lunes, el gobernador de Minnesota, Tim Walz, informó en un comunicado que Trump accedió a permitir que la investigación estatal continúe.

“El presidente estuvo de acuerdo en hablar con su Departamento de Seguridad Nacional para asegurar que la Oficina de Aprehensión Criminal de Minnesota pueda realizar una investigación independiente, como sería lo habitual”, señaló Walz en su comunicado tras la llamada con Trump.

Walz dijo a Anderson Cooper de CNN esta semana que Tom Homan —el zar de la frontera en la Casa Blanca, enviado por Trump a Minnesota tras el tiroteo— le aseguró que hablaría con el director del FBI, Kash Patel, sobre los problemas entre los investigadores estatales y federales.

“Dijo que llamaría a Kash Patel al respecto”, afirmó Walz.

El FBI suele liderar este tipo de investigaciones, pero en este caso ha cedido protagonismo al HSI, incluso entregando el arma de Pretti a esa agencia. El FBI inicialmente envió el arma a su laboratorio local para pruebas estándar.

El HSI también tiene en su poder el teléfono de Pretti y otras pruebas recogidas en la escena, y un pequeño grupo de investigadores del HSI ha estado revisando grabaciones del incidente y videos de hasta 30 cámaras corporales usadas por los agentes ese día.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

The post Read more

Sergey Watgers // Shutterstock

The choice to commute by motorcycle is often driven by a desire for efficiency, fuel economy, and the unique sense of freedom that two wheels provide. However, the reality of sharing the road with passenger vehicles introduces a specific set of risks that differ significantly from those faced by individuals in traditional cars. While every motorist should prioritize safety, the financial and physical stakes are disproportionately higher for motorcyclists. One of the most critical, yet frequently misunderstood, components of a robust motorcycle insurance strategy is uninsured motorist (UM) and underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage. For a biker, this protection is not merely an optional add-on; it is a fundamental safety net that addresses the unique vulnerabilities of the open road. Cheap Insurance allows riders to navigate these complexities and secure affordable motorcycle insurance that provides maximum protection without straining the monthly budget.

The Disparity of Physical Risk

The most immediate reason why UM coverage is vital for bikers involves the physics of a collision. Drivers of passenger cars are shielded by reinforced steel frames, crumple zones, and multiple airbag systems. In contrast, a motorcyclist lacks any structural barrier between the body and the environment. Data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) consistently indicates that motorcyclists are significantly more likely to suffer catastrophic injuries or fatalities in the event of a crash compared to occupants of enclosed vehicles. This physical vulnerability is exactly why selecting the right motorcycle insurance policy is a matter of both financial and personal safety.

When a driver in a car is struck by a UM, the damage is often limited to property loss or minor soft-tissue injuries. For a biker, a similar incident frequently results in traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord trauma, or complex fractures. These injuries lead to medical expenses that can easily exceed $100,000 within the first few days of treatment. Without specific UM provisions within a motorcycle insurance policy, a rider who is not at fault may be left to bear these astronomical costs alone if the responsible party lacks insurance. Fortunately, finding affordable motorcycle insurance that includes this critical protection is possible, ensuring that a lack of funds does not stand in the way of necessary medical recovery.

The Reality of the Uninsured Driver Crisis

Despite mandatory insurance laws across the United States, a substantial percentage of the driving population remains uninsured. According to recent 2026 insurance industry reports, roughly 1 in 7 drivers on the road does not carry liability insurance. In certain high-traffic states, this ratio can be as high as 1 in 4

For a driver, an accident with an uninsured person is a frustration; for a biker, it is a financial crisis. Most individuals who fail to maintain insurance also lack the personal assets necessary to satisfy a legal judgment. Consequently, a

Thiago B Trevisan // Shutterstock

Commercial airliners are built for the long haul. With the right maintenance and retrofitting, a jet that has been flying for decades can feel just as comfortable and capable as one fresh off the assembly line. But when you look at safety, the picture gets complicated.

Planes built twenty or thirty years ago simply weren’t designed with the same passenger protection standards as their modern counterparts. Fractional Jet Ownership explores the hard data on safety standards and what it means for today’s airline fleets.

The Data Link: Age vs. Incident Probability

The foundational metric for this risk profile comes from a longitudinal study by the MIT International Center for Air Transportation. Researchers analyzing 50 years of accident data identified a statistical trend of increased fatal crash risk among airframes exceeding 20 years of service.

While strict regulatory environments in the U.S. and Europe mitigate this risk through rigorous oversight, the core engineering reality remains: As flight hours accumulate, susceptibility to mechanical failure increases.

It is important to distinguish between airworthiness and modernization. An older plane might be mechanically sound, but it lacks the passive safety features baked into 21st-century designs. Modern cockpits feature automated flight envelope protection—systems that physically prevent a pilot from stalling or rolling the aircraft too far—which were largely absent in previous generations.

Additionally, newer airframes utilize advanced composite materials that offer superior crashworthiness and fire resistance compared to traditional aluminum structures. When an older jet is kept in service, it misses out on these structural and systemic evolutions, creating a “safety gap” that widens with every year of service.

The challenge for the industry is that the global fleet is aging toward this 20-year threshold. According to the International Air Transport Association (IATA), the average age of commercial aircraft currently stands at 15.1 years, with the passenger-specific segment averaging 12.8 years.

The Supply Chain Bottleneck

This aging trend is not purely a strategic choice by airlines; it is a byproduct of systemic manufacturing delays. IATA reports indicate a severe backlog in new aircraft orders, with delivery timelines extending up to a decade at current demand levels. Supply chain constraints, exacerbated by post-pandemic raw material shortages, have throttled the rollout of newer models.

This forces operators to retain older assets longer than anticipated, directly impacting their bottom line. As airframes age, maintenance requirements scale non-linearly. IATA estimates that maintaining these legacy fleets adds approximately $3.1 billion annually to industry costs—a financial strain that compounds the existing volatility of fuel prices.

PeopleImages // Shutterstock

Every startup experiences a moment of reckoning: the point where the informal, relationship-driven approach to customer management becomes a liability rather than an asset.

When a founder can hold the entire customer database in their head, customer relationship management tools seem unnecessary. But as the team expands beyond five people and the customer count exceeds a few dozen, that personal knowledge becomes fragmented across email inboxes, messaging platforms, and individual notebooks.

This is where many founders face a common misconception: CRM is a tool for large enterprises, not scrappy startups. The reality is different. CRM maturity should evolve with your business. The system that works at the seed stage will likely not be the best fit at the Series A stage. And the solution you select at Series A may not scale effectively to Series B.

Nutshell explains how to select a CRM aligned with your business’s growth stage. The right CRM isn’t about finding the most powerful platform—it’s about finding the right platform for where your startup is right now, while building in the flexibility to grow beyond it.

Key takeaways

• CRM needs evolve with your startup’s stage: What works at the seed stage (simple contact management) becomes inadequate at Series A (automation and reporting) and Series B (advanced analytics and enterprise integration). Select a system for your current stage, not your imagined future.
• Alignment matters more than features: A CRM with 500 unused features will fail faster than a simple system your team actually uses. Involve your sales team in the selection, prioritize ease of adoption over feature richness, and focus on aligning with your actual workflow.
• Plan for migration as you grow: Most startups will use multiple CRM systems as they scale. This isn’t a failure—it’s natural. Reassess your CRM annually to identify when it’s constraining growth, recognizing that the total cost of ownership (implementation, training, integration) matters as much as monthly subscription fees.

Understanding when and why CRM matters

Before evaluating any specific CRM solution, founders must understand the fundamental purpose of CRM systems and when they become truly necessary.

A CRM isn’t primarily about automation or fancy dashboards. At its core, it’s about creating a single source of truth for customer interactions, ensuring that knowledge doesn’t live exclusively in individual team members’ heads.

The view of the startup landscape has evolved considerably. The global CRM market reached $112.91 billion in 2025, according to Fortune Business Insights, which expects it to grow 12.4% by 2034.

Many founders struggle to identify the right moment to implement a CRM, or they select solutions misaligned with their growth stage.

It’