Click on the Manage Content for adding and managing content.
Click on the Rotator Settings and choose what and how it will be displayed.

Ukraine accuses Israel of aiding Russian trade in stolen grain

Kraig Pakulski 0 21 Article rating: No rating

By Tal Shalev, CNN

Jerusalem (CNN) — Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has accused Israel of knowingly allowing grain stolen by Russia to be unloaded at Israeli ports, threatening to impose sanctions on anyone involved in the shipments, which Kyiv says have continued despite multiple appeals to Israeli officials.

Zelensky’s warning Tuesday reflects a deepening rift between the two countries, brought to a head by the arrival in Israeli waters of a vessel named Panormitis, which entered Haifa Bay last week and is currently anchored offshore, apparently awaiting a berth. Ukraine says the ship is carrying wheat stolen from occupied Ukrainian territories and would be the second such shipment to dock and unload in Haifa this month.

“In any normal country, purchasing stolen goods is an act that entails legal liability. This applies, in particular, to grain stolen by Russia,” Zelensky wrote on X. “This is not – and cannot be – legitimate business. The Israeli authorities cannot be unaware of which ships are arriving at the country’s ports and what cargo they are carrying.”

In a series of forceful pushbacks, Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Saar accused Ukraine of engaging in “Twitter diplomacy,” saying it had not submitted evidence for its claim the grain was stolen. He also underlined that the contentious Panormitis vessel had not yet docked in Haifa, adding that Israeli tax authorities were now examining the matter.

Since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine more than four years ago, Kyiv has consistently accused Moscow of the systematic looting of its agricultural resources – the true origin of which it says is hidden when the stolen grain is sold on world markets.

According to an investigative report in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, at least four shipments of illegal grain have docked in Israel this year. The report added that such deliveries have been ongoing since 2023, with the total number reaching over 30.

Following the Haaretz report and the arrival of the Panormitis, Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha on Tuesday summoned the Israeli ambassador in Kyiv to protest what he called “Israel’s lack of appropriate response,” adding that it “harmed bilateral relations.”

An Israeli official, speaking with CNN on condition of anonymity, said Israel cannot seize the shipments without due process, noting there is an “established mutual legal assistance protocol” according to which Ukraine’s attorney general would need to submit a legal aid request, supply evidence and coordinate with Israeli police to halt the vessel.

A Ukrainian Foreign Ministry spokesman rejected that assertion, telling CNN during a press briefing in Kyiv Tuesday that Ukraine had “exhausted all closed channels and official diplomatic requests.”

The spokesman added Israel was not alone in importing illegal grain, saying Ukraine saw evidence of a “systematic practice” showing the “deliberate facilitation of illegal economic activity” linked to Russia’s occupation of parts of Ukraine.

The European Union also weighed in, requesting additional information from Israeli authorities on the matter and warning it may impose sanctions on those involved as well.

“We condemn all actions that help fund Russia’s illegal war effort and circumvent EU sanctions and remain ready to target such actions by listing individuals and entities in third countries if necessary,” an EU spokesman told CNN.

Israel-Ukraine relations have been persistently tense since Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022. Israeli leaders have sought to keep channels open with both Kyiv and Moscow, limiting military assistance to Ukraine mainly to non-lethal humanitarian aid, and rejecting pressure to transfer Israeli-made weapons systems and arms to Kyiv.

More recently, Ukraine has positioned itself as a regional security provider in t

Con tono muy Trump, abogados piden a tribunal que anule el fallo que detuvo las obras del salón de baile de la Casa Blanca

Kraig Pakulski 0 22 Article rating: No rating

Por Devan Cole, CNN

En una presentación judicial inusualmente mordaz que imitó el tono clásico del presidente Donald Trump, el Departamento de Justicia pidió a un juez federal a última hora del lunes que anule un fallo que habría detenido la construcción de un enorme nuevo salón de baile de la Casa Blanca.

La solicitud del DOJ argumentó que el presunto hombre armado que apareció en la Cena de la Asociación de Corresponsales de la Casa Blanca “confirma” que la orden judicial emitida por el juez de distrito de EE.UU. Richard Leon “es intolerable e insostenible”.

La presentación, redactada en términos tajantes, representa el más reciente intento del Gobierno de Trump por zafarse de una prolongada batalla legal presentada por el principal grupo de preservación histórica del país contra el proyecto del salón de baile, que ha derivado en varios fallos clave de Leon que dicen que Trump no puede avanzar con el proyecto hasta que el Congreso lo autorice expresamente.

La más reciente presentación de ocho páginas, firmada por el secretario de Justicia interino Todd Blanche y el subsecretario adjunto Stan Woodward, está salpicada de un lenguaje que se ha vuelto común en las redes sociales del presidente.

“El National Trust for Historic Preservation es un nombre hermoso, pero incluso su nombre es FALSO porque cuando agregan las palabras ‘en los Estados Unidos’ al National Trust for Historic Preservation hace que suene como una agencia gubernamental, lo cual no es”, comienza la presentación.

Aunque las decisiones de Leon han sido suspendidas por un tribunal federal de apelaciones, los abogados de Trump durante el fin de semana exigieron que el National Trust for Historic Preservation retire su demanda contra el salón de baile, algo que el grupo se niega a hacer. En respuesta, el Gobierno recurrió a Leon para pedirle que rescinda un fallo de principios de este mes que decía que los trabajadores no podían avanzar con ninguna construcción sobre el nivel del suelo del salón de baile, pero sí podían continuar con la finalización de un búnker altamente sofisticado que se está construyendo bajo el sitio del antiguo Ala Este.

La presentación, que no fue firmada por ningún abogado de carrera del departamento, afirma que el caso de fondo es “frívolo”, aunque Leon nunca ha hecho tal determinación en el asunto. Critica al Trust por padecer el “síndrome de trastorno por Trump” y pregunta por qué alguien se opondría al proyecto dado que se está pagando mediante donaciones privadas.

“Este tribunal nunca debió haber ordenado la suspensión de este proyecto, pero ahora, después del intento de asesinato del sábado por la noche, que nunca podría haber ocurrido en la nueva instalación, las mentes razonables ya no pueden discrepar: la orden judicial debe ser disuelta”, escribieron los abogados en la presentación.

“El hecho de que un asesino estuvo a meros segundos de dispararle al presidente —junto con su familia, la mayor parte de su gabinete, su equipo de alto nivel y el cuerpo de prensa de Washington— deja en evidencia que Washington no tiene un espacio seguro para grandes eventos de alto perfil, ni uno capaz de ‘albergar un evento con la línea de sucesión del Gobierno de EE.UU.’”, dice la presentación. “¡Lo que hizo el sábado por la noche no podría haber ocurrido en esta nueva y altamente segura instalación!”.

Sin embargo, observadores han señalado que la gala de prensa es un evento privado que se realiza fuera de la Casa Blanca y que un nuevo salón de baile no cambiaría esa realidad.

Y Leon ya había rechazado previamente las afirmaciones del Gobierno de que detener las obras del proyecto pone en peligro la vida del presidente u otras personas en la Casa Blanca.

EU’s ‘yes means yes’ rape definition seeks to close loopholes allowing rapists to walk free

Kraig Pakulski 0 19 Article rating: No rating

By Niamh Kennedy, Kara Fox, CNN

London (CNN) — European lawmakers have voted in favor of defining sex without active consent as rape, marking a historic step for women’s rights and survivors of sexual violence in the EU.

The European Parliament’s resolution, passed on Tuesday by an overwhelming margin, urges all EU member states to adopt an only “yes means yes” legal standard for consent while recognizing that a “yes” obtained through coercion is not valid.

The move seeks to replace the traditional “no means no” principle, which activists argue fails to protect victims by not requiring explicit, affirmative consent for sexual acts.

The resolution is the just the first step in the political process: It will now need to be proposed as legislation for EU member states to vote on.

Dutch MEP Anna Strolenberg said that “a society that truly respects women does not ask whether they resisted enough, it asks whether they freely agreed.” She told CNN, “No one can consent while asleep, drugged, unaware or paralyzed by fear. Any law that leaves room for this doubt, leaves room for violence,”

At present, rape laws in Europe generally follow one of two models – consent-based, which considers rape a sexual act without consent, or coercion-based, which requires a sexual act to have taken place by force. Twenty-one of the EU’s 27 member states have adopted consent-based rape laws, according to Amnesty International, and in some, including Sweden and Spain, the law follows the “yes means yes” approach. Meanwhile, in countries like Hungary and Latvia, the law generally requires proof of use of force, threats, or coercion.

Those legislative gaps create significant hurdles for survivors, experts say, as it requires them to prove the use of violence or threats.

French MEP Manon Aubry said in a debate ahead of the vote that laws that do not recognize the importance of active consent allow “perpetrators to have full impunity.”

In October 2025, France, after years of opposition, updated its criminal code to explicitly define rape as any sexual act committed without consent. The move followed a public reckoning in the wake of the landmark Pelicot trial, where 50 men were charged with the mass rape of Gisèle Pelicot, whose ex-husband Dominique Pelicot drugged her, and organized her rapes with men he met online.

“Important step” in fight against “rape culture”

A series of similar, high-profile drug-facilitated sexual abuse (DFSA) cases have also come to light in Europe. In December, a German man was found guilty of drugging and raping his unconscious wife over several years and filming the assaults.

While European lawmakers have historically struggled to agree on a unified, EU-wide definition of rape, Irish MEP Maria Walsh said that CNN’s recent reporting on an online “rape academy” has accelerated the debate.

CNN’s discovery of a Telegram group, where nearly 1,000 men shared step-by-step instructions on drugging and assaulting their partners, and which was part of a wider network of non-consensual image sharing, underlines “why a European-wide response is so badly needed” when it comes to prosecuting sexual assault, Walsh said.

Amnesty International’s Dinushika Dissanayake welcomed Tuesday’s resolution, saying that it was an important step in the fight against “rape culture,” which is underpinned and perpetuated by harmful myths and gender stereotypes, (and) attempts to normalize and even justify sexual violence in our societies.”

One in six women in the EU experience sexual violence in adulthood, according to Amnesty, with one in 10 women raped in their lifetime.

“At a time when the headlin

RSS
First16861687168816891691169316941695Last