Click on the Manage Content for adding and managing content.
Click on the Rotator Settings and choose what and how it will be displayed.

US nonprofits sue Trump administration over ICC sanctions that ‘muzzle Palestine advocacy’

Kraig Pakulski 0 42 Article rating: No rating

By Sana Noor Haq, CNN

(CNN) — Two US nonprofits have sued the Trump administration over sanctions targeting the International Criminal Court (ICC) — penalties that they say “violate Americans’ constitutional right to engage in Palestine-related” human rights advocacy.

Democracy for the Arab World Now (DAWN), an organization that promotes democracy and human rights in the Middle East and North Africa, and the Taxpayers Alliance Against Genocide (TAAG) filed a lawsuit Wednesday in a Manhattan federal court seeking to bar the Trump administration from using an executive order “to prevent US citizens from supporting investigations into US and Israeli abuses,” according to a statement released by the two organizations. Those measures “muzzle Palestine advocacy,” the statement added.

An executive order issued by US President Donald Trump in February 2025 authorizes punitive measures against ICC staffers, such as sanctions and bans on entering the United States, because of what the administration described as “illegitimate and baseless actions targeting America and our close ally Israel.”

Several other challenges to the ICC sanctions have been filed to date, but this lawsuit is the first that aims to stop Trump-appointed officials from using sanctions law to “bar Americans from supporting the ICC’s investigations into US and Israeli atrocity crimes, or from working with (UN special human rights envoy Francesca Albanese) and the sanctioned Palestinian NGOs,” the organizations’ statement said.

Those sanctions “unconstitutionally restrict Americans from seeking justice on Palestine at the ICC and working with human rights defenders designated solely for calling on the ICC to investigate Israeli and American nationals,” the statement added.

CNN has reached out to the US State Department and the White House for comment. The United States is not a member of the court. While the US signed the treaty that established the court in 2000, it did not ratify it.

Over the past 18 months, the Trump administration has issued a series of sanctions that have penalized organizations and individuals who say they are seeking accountability for Israeli actions in Gaza — including under the jurisdiction of the Netherlands-based court. That campaign escalated on Monday when Secretary of State Marco Rubio vowed to use “all the tools at our government’s disposal” to “dismantle the ICC, brick by brick, if necessary.”

In September, the State Department imposed sanctions on three Palestinian human rights groups — al-Haq, the al-Mezan Center for Human Rights and the Palestinian Center for Human Rights (PCHR) — that had asked the ICC to investigate and arrest Israeli leaders following accusations of war crimes in Gaza.

The US also leveled sanctions last year against Albanese, an Italian human rights expert who has served as UN special rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories since 2022, as well as ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan and four other judges.

In his first term, Trump targeted the ICC for seeking to investigate alleged war crimes by US forces in Afghanistan.

Earlier this week, Omar Shakir, executive director of DAWN, told CNN that the Trump administration’s efforts to scrutinize the ICC and other bodies seeking accountability underscore how such “efforts go far beyond trying to undermine the (ICC) and undermine

US nonprofits sue Trump administration over ICC sanctions that ‘muzzle Palestine advocacy’

Kraig Pakulski 0 40 Article rating: No rating
Two US advocacy groups filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration over sanctions targeting the International Criminal Court

By Sana Noor Haq, CNN

(CNN) — Two US nonprofits have sued the Trump administration over sanctions targeting the International Criminal Court (ICC) — penalties that they say “violate Americans’ constitutional right to engage in Palestine-related” human rights advocacy.

Democracy for the Arab World Now (DAWN), an organization that promotes democracy and human rights in the Middle East and North Africa, and the Taxpayers Alliance Against Genocide (TAAG) filed a lawsuit Wednesday in a Manhattan federal court seeking to bar the Trump administration from using an executive order “to prevent US citizens from supporting investigations into US and Israeli abuses,” according to a statement released by the two organizations. Those measures “muzzle Palestine advocacy,” the statement added.

An executive order issued by US President Donald Trump in February 2025 authorizes punitive measures against ICC staffers, such as sanctions and bans on entering the United States, because of what the administration described as “illegitimate and baseless actions targeting America and our close ally Israel.”

Several other challenges to the ICC sanctions have been filed to date, but this lawsuit is the first that aims to stop Trump-appointed officials from using sanctions law to “bar Americans from supporting the ICC’s investigations into US and Israeli atrocity crimes, or from working with (UN special human rights envoy Francesca Albanese) and the sanctioned Palestinian NGOs,” the organizations’ statement said.

Those sanctions “unconstitutionally restrict Americans from seeking justice on Palestine at the ICC and working with human rights defenders designated solely for calling on the ICC to investigate Israeli and American nationals,” the statement added.

CNN has reached out to the US State Department and the White House for comment. The United States is not a member of the court. While the US signed the treaty that established the court in 2000, it did not ratify it.

Over the past 18 months, the Trump administration has issued a series of sanctions that have penalized organizations and individuals who say they are seeking accountability for Israeli actions in Gaza — including under the jurisdiction of the Netherlands-based court. That campaign escalated on Monday when Secretary of State Marco Rubio vowed to use “all the tools at our government’s disposal” to “dismantle the ICC, brick by brick, if necessary.”

In September, the State Department imposed sanctions on three Palestinian human rights groups — al-Haq, the al-Mezan Center for Human Rights and the Palestinian Center for Human Rights (PCHR) — that had asked the ICC to investigate and arrest Israeli leaders following accusations of war crimes in Gaza.

The US also leveled sanctions last year against Albanese, an Italian human rights expert who has served as UN special rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories since 2022, as well as ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan and four other judges.

<

En enero, el DHS defendió rápidamente los tiroteos fatales de ICE. Ahora sus declaraciones parecen estar cambiando

Kraig Pakulski 0 34 Article rating: No rating

Por Danya Gainor y Annette Choi, CNN

Tras el asesinato de Renee Good y Alex Pretti a manos de agentes federales de inmigración en enero, el Departamento de Seguridad Nacional (DHS) emitió rápidamente comunicados defendiendo el uso de la fuerza letal, alegando que las víctimas intentaban asesinar a agentes del orden. El juicio precipitado de la agencia sobre los incidentes provocó pedidos de investigaciones imparciales por parte de funcionarios locales y una oleada de protestas. Algunas de las versiones del DHS fueron posteriormente refutadas por videos, fallos judiciales y otras pruebas.

La dirección del DHS se enfrentó a cambios estructurales relativos a la rendición de cuentas tras las muertes de Good y Pretti, incluyendo la destitución de la secretaria Kristi Noem. Su sucesor, Markwayne Mullin, ha favorecido públicamente un estilo discreto de control migratorio que se basa más en operaciones selectivas que en las redadas a gran escala e indiscriminadas que caracterizaron el mandato de Noem.

Este mes, tras el asesinato de dos personas más en Estados Unidos a manos de agentes del ICE, las declaraciones públicas de la agencia han cambiado notablemente: el DHS se ha tomado mucho más tiempo para pronunciarse sobre los tiroteos y, si bien parte del lenguaje se ha mantenido similar o idéntico, la agencia ha suavizado otros detalles.

CNN se ha puesto en contacto con el DHS para obtener comentarios al respecto, pero hasta ahora no ha obtenido respuestas.

A continuación, CNN ha anotado algunos de los detalles clave de las primeras declaraciones públicas de la agencia tras los asesinatos de Good, Pretti, Lorenzo Salgado Araujo y Joan Sebastián Durán Guerrero.

Con información de Michael Williams y Priscilla Alvarez, de CNN.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

The post En enero, el DHS defendió rápidamente los tiroteos fatales de ICE. Ahora sus declaraciones parecen estar cambiando appeared first on News Channel 3-12.

Former Obama White House attorney Kathy Ruemmler said ‘it was a mistake’ to deal with Epstein and she regrets it

Kraig Pakulski 0 33 Article rating: No rating

By Annie Grayer, Andrew Kaczynski, Em Steck, CNN

(CNN) — Former Obama White House counsel Kathy Ruemmler said she regrets interacting with the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and believes now it was a mistake, according to opening remarks she delivered to House committee investigators as part of a closed-door interview.

“If I knew then what I know now about who Epstein really was, I never would have accepted an initial meeting with him. It was a mistake to deal with him, and I regret it,” Ruemmler said, according to prepared remarks provided to CNN. “But many people assume that given everything we know now about Epstein, everyone who dealt with him before his 2019 indictment must have known everything then. In my case, that assumption is completely wrong.”

Ruemmler was called to testify voluntarily by the Republican-led House Oversight Committee for a closed-door interview as part of the congressional probe into Epstein after numerous news stories scrutinized her ties to the disgraced financier. Reporting from CNN’s KFILE detailed the extent of her relationship with Epstein, including that she was among a small group of advisers to help him ward off legal and reputational risk during the final years of his life.

Ruemmler did not specifically address how she sought to help Epstein protect his reputation in her opening remarks but did say, “even though I wasn’t his lawyer, he sought my advice from time to time, as many people do. I was friendly with him in that context, and I dealt with him in my ordinary course — casually, informally, and sometimes irreverently.” She also said that Epstein was never her client.

She said that she first met Epstein in 2014 — and explained how she came to learn about how Epstein pled guilty in 2008 to charges that included the solicitation of a minor for prostitution along with other offenses and why she continued to engage with him.

“Epstein told me that, while a small number of the women he had solicited for prostitution turned out to be under the age of consent, he had not known that any of them were underage. Epstein appeared to be quite open about the conduct leading to his conviction, or so he led me to believe. He expressed remorse, embarrassment, and regret for his conduct, which he described as paying money for sex to women he believed to be over the age of 18,” Ruemmler said in her opening statement.

“Notwithstanding his conviction, by the time I met him, he had active relationships with an extensive group of respected professionals in business, academia, politics, and the arts. And given the nature of my law practice, I routinely dealt with compromised or controversial people, including those facing criminal or other allegations of wrongdoing,” she said, while adding that she “at no time” endorsed or excused the conduct to which Epstein pled guilty.

She called Epstein a “masterful liar” — and also said that she “did not see any evidence of ongoing criminal conduct or misconduct of any kind by Epstein.”

She said that, “if I had seen or heard any evidence suggesting that he was abusing women or girls, I would have immediately reported him to law enforcement.”

Ahead of the interview, Ruemmler told CNN, “I will answer any questions that they think will help their inquiry. So, again, I’m looking forward to meeting with the committee members today.”

House Oversight Chair James Comer said prior to the start of the interview, “she’s a very powerful person that was probably more involved in working with him to rehabilitate his image, which I would argue has made it more difficult for him to be held accountable. So, very concerning. We want to know what she

RSS
First301302303304306308309310Last