Click on the Manage Content for adding and managing content.
Click on the Rotator Settings and choose what and how it will be displayed.

Grupos de izquierda y progresistas defensores del control de armas están registrando un aumento acelerado de nuevos miembros

Kraig Pakulski 0 6 Article rating: No rating

Por Harmeet Kaur, CNN

Varios grupos defensores de las armas, de nicho y con inclinación progresista, dijeron que desde la muerte de Alex Pretti a manos de agentes federales en Minneapolis apenas dan abasto ante el aumento de la demanda de entrenamientos en el uso de armas de fuego.

Con el presidente Donald Trump enviando agentes federales armados a comunidades de todo el país, incluso liberales y personas de izquierda que antes evitaban las armas están considerando armarse. Y aunque en Estados Unidos suele pensarse que los dueños de armas tienden a ser más republicanos y hombres, en los últimos años —en particular desde 2020— más mujeres, homosexuales y personas negras y de otras minorías han comenzado a portar armas.

Las clases de fin de semana en L.A. Progressive Shooters están agotadas hasta marzo. Las inscripciones para los cursos de permisos para portar armas en Pink Pistols Twin Cities, que atiende a personas LGBTQ en Minneapolis y St. Paul, pasaron de un promedio de cinco personas por clase a 25. El grupo agregó recientemente siete cursos más para responder al mayor interés, y esos también se están llenando. Para parafrasear un meme reciente: la derecha está pidiendo control de armas y la izquierda está comprando armas.

“En los últimos días ha habido un giro”, dice Lara Smith, portavoz nacional del Liberal Gun Club. “Esto cambió las posturas en la izquierda”.

Alex Pretti, un querido enfermero de cuidados intensivos que atendía a veteranos enfermos y un amante de la vida al aire libre preocupado por el medio ambiente, también era, como un tercio de los estadounidenses, dueño de un arma. Portaba legalmente su arma en una funda antes de que agentes federales lo desarmaran y luego lo mataran a tiros.

Jordan Levine, fundador de la comunidad inclusiva de armas A Better Way 2A, dice que su organización ha visto un aumento de grupos e instructores de armas que solicitan sumarse a su página de recursos en las últimas semanas. Ready Rainbow en Chicago, Grassroots Defense en Iowa y Solidarity Defense en Sacramento son algunas de las incorporaciones recientes. “La gente está asustada y enojada, y quiere equilibrar la desigualdad de poder que estamos viendo en las noticias, donde ICE pasa por encima de las personas sin que haya recursos”, añade.

Philip Smith, fundador y presidente de la National African American Gun Association, dice que la membresía de su organización ha crecido desde que comenzó el segundo mandato de Trump y desde la muerte de Pretti. “La gente se une cuando tiene miedo”, dice Smith. “La gente se une cuando ciertas personas llegan al poder, porque eso les genera temor. La gente se une cuando ve estos tiroteos en todo el país y parece que la locura no deja de crecer”.

El miedo y la política son grandes motores de la venta de armas. Las compras aumentan después de tiroteos masivos y ataques terroristas domésticos, o cuando la gente percibe que se avecinan restricciones legislativas, como cuando un demócrata es elegido presidente. Lo contrario suele ocurrir cuando hay un presidente republicano, dice Matt Lacombe, politólogo que estudia la cultura de las armas y autor de Firepower: How the NRA Turned Gun Owners into a Political Force: las ventas de armas bajaron después de la primera elección de Trump en 2016 y, en gran medida, se han mantenido bajas durante su segundo mandato (la industria de las armas lo llama el “Trump Slump”). Pero Lacombe señala que los datos nacionales podrían estar ocultando tendencias más pequeñas que se están desarrollando en algunas partes del país.

“Ya no parece ser el caso que comprar y portar armas en respuesta a amenazas percibidas sea algo exclusivamente conservador”, añade.

Mientras el Gobierno de Trump continúa con su ofensiva migratoria en ciudades de Estados Unidos, personas armadas están acudiendo a protestas contra ICE y a patrullajes vecinales, y algunos grupos de armas están al

Excarcelan al activista venezolano Javier Tarazona tras pasar más de cuatro años detenido en El Helicoide

Kraig Pakulski 0 6 Article rating: No rating

Por CNN en Español

El activista venezolano de derechos humanos Javier Tarazona fue excarcelado este domingo en Caracas, según anunció su familia, después de pasar más de cuatro años detenido.

“Luego de 1.675 días, 4 años y 7 meses, llegó este tan anhelado día, mi hermano Javier Tarazona está en libertad”, publicó en X Rafael Tarazona, quien también pasó unos meses detenido.

El activista dirigió Fundaredes, una ONG que denunciaba la presencia de guerrilla y paramilitares en Venezuela. En 2021, Tarazona fue imputado por terrorismo, instigación al odio y traición a la patria, cargos que siempre rechazó.

Junto a Tarazona fueron excarceladas otras personas este domingo en El Helicoide, sede del Servicio Bolivariano de Inteligencia (Sebin), según informó Gonzalo Himiob, vicepresidente de la ONG Foro Penal, que verifica el proceso en contacto con los familiares de detenidos.

La presidenta encargada de Venezuela, Delcy Rodríguez, anunció el viernes una “ley de amnistía general” que podría beneficiar a cientos de presos políticos que aún están privados de su libertad en el país, y también la reconversión del centro de detención.

Desde que el Gobierno de Venezuela anunció el 8 de enero que liberaría a “un número importante” de presos políticos, más de 300 personas han salido de prisión, de acuerdo con el registro de organizaciones civiles, una cifra que se mantiene alejada de las más de 800 reportadas por las autoridades desde diciembre.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

The post Excarcelan al activista venezolano Javier Tarazona tras pasar más de cuatro años detenido en El Helicoide appeared first on News Channel 3-12.

Iran’s top diplomat hopeful for negotiations even amid US military buildup

Kraig Pakulski 0 14 Article rating: No rating
In this photo released by the official website of the office of the Iranian supreme leader


CNN

By Frederik Pleitgen, Joseph Ataman, Claudia Otto CNN

Tehran, Iran (CNN) — Even with US forces poised to strike Iran, the country’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told CNN Sunday that he was “confident that we can achieve a deal” with the United States on Tehran’s nuclear weapons program.

“Unfortunately, we have lost our trust [in] the US as a negotiating partner,” he said, but the exchange of messages through friendly countries in the region was facilitating “fruitful” talks with the US.

There appeared to be similar optimism on the US side this weekend. Aboard Air Force One Saturday, US President Donald Trump told reporters that Iran was “talking to us, seriously talking to us.”

Refusing to promise that Iran would engage in direct talks with US negotiators, Araghchi highlighted the need to address the “substance of negotiations” rather than the form.

His remarks came as Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, struck a defiant tone, warning that any US strike on Iran would result in a regional war.

Khamenei told a crowd at the Imam Khomeini mosque in Tehran on Sunday that Iran does not “intend to attack any country, but the Iranian nation will deliver a firm blow to anyone who attacks and harasses it,” according to state media.

“The Americans should know that if they initiate a war, this time it will be a regional war,” he said, posting similar remarks on X.

Progress towards renewed negotiations appears to have stumbled on Iranian demands that they concentrate on nuclear issues – and the US refusal to reduce its large military presence in the region, which looms large over any diplomatic efforts.

Pressed by CNN on questions of Iran’s extensive missile arsenal – believed to have been largely rebuilt following last year’s war with Israel – and the country’s regional proxies, like the Yemen-based Houthis that have harassed regional shipping, Araghchi said the focus must be on Iran’s nuclear capabilities instead.

“Let’s not talk about impossible things,” he said, “And not lose the opportunity to achieve a fair and equitable deal to ensure no nuclear weapons. That as I said, is achievable even in a short period of time.”

In return, Araghchi said that Tehran would expect the lifting of US sanctions – which have been a yoke around the neck of the Iranian economy for more than a decade – as well as respect for Iran’s right to continue nuclear enrichment for peaceful purposes.

If talks fail, Iran was ready for war, Araghchi promised, although a conflict would likely spiral beyond Iran, he said, echoing Khamenei’s comments.

But a war, “would be a disaster for everybody,” Araghchi said, and US bases across the region would be targets for Iran’s military, which had seen the limitations and strengths of its missile arsenal in last year’s 12-day war against Israel.

Human rights groups have estimated t

Iran’s top diplomat hopeful for negotiations even amid US military buildup

Kraig Pakulski 0 19 Article rating: No rating

By Frederik Pleitgen, Joseph Ataman, Claudia Otto CNN

Tehran, Iran (CNN) — Even with US forces poised to strike Iran, the country’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told CNN Sunday that he was “confident that we can achieve a deal” with the United States on Tehran’s nuclear weapons program.

“Unfortunately, we have lost our trust [in] the US as a negotiating partner,” he said, but the exchange of messages through friendly countries in the region was facilitating “fruitful” talks with the US.

There appeared to be similar optimism on the US side this weekend. Aboard Air Force One Saturday, US President Donald Trump told reporters that Iran was “talking to us, seriously talking to us.”

Refusing to promise that Iran would engage in direct talks with US negotiators, Araghchi highlighted the need to address the “substance of negotiations” rather than the form.

His remarks came as Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, struck a defiant tone, warning that any US strike on Iran would result in a regional war.

Khamenei told a crowd at the Imam Khomeini mosque in Tehran on Sunday that Iran does not “intend to attack any country, but the Iranian nation will deliver a firm blow to anyone who attacks and harasses it,” according to state media.

“The Americans should know that if they initiate a war, this time it will be a regional war,” he said, posting similar remarks on X.

Progress towards renewed negotiations appears to have stumbled on Iranian demands that they concentrate on nuclear issues – and the US refusal to reduce its large military presence in the region, which looms large over any diplomatic efforts.

Pressed by CNN on questions of Iran’s extensive missile arsenal – believed to have been largely rebuilt following last year’s war with Israel – and the country’s regional proxies, like the Yemen-based Houthis that have harassed regional shipping, Araghchi said the focus must be on Iran’s nuclear capabilities instead.

“Let’s not talk about impossible things,” he said, “And not lose the opportunity to achieve a fair and equitable deal to ensure no nuclear weapons. That as I said, is achievable even in a short period of time.”

In return, Araghchi said that Tehran would expect the lifting of US sanctions – which have been a yoke around the neck of the Iranian economy for more than a decade – as well as respect for Iran’s right to continue nuclear enrichment for peaceful purposes.

If talks fail, Iran was ready for war, Araghchi promised, although a conflict would likely spiral beyond Iran, he said, echoing Khamenei’s comments.

But a war, “would be a disaster for everybody,” Araghchi said, and US bases across the region would be targets for Iran’s military, which had seen the limitations and strengths of its missile arsenal in last year’s 12-day war against Israel.

Human rights groups have estimated that at least several thousand people were killed in street protests across Iran last month, which led Trump to warn Tehran that the US would carry out strikes against the regime.

Trump declined on Saturday to say whether he has decided on a potential military strike against Iran.

“Some people think that. Some people don’t,” Trump said when asked about concerns that backing away from a strike would embolden Tehran.

Trump again refused to provide specifics about a possible military strike, repeating comments he has made previously.

“I certainly can’t tell you that, but we do have very big, powerful ships heading in that direction,” he said. “As you know, I can’t tell you. I hope they negotiate something that’s

RSS
First34123413341434153417341934203421Last