By Eric Levenson, CNN
(CNN) — In March 2021, a Brown University doctoral candidate wrote an op-ed in the school paper criticizing Brown’s increasing use of surveillance cameras and lack of transparency.
“In the span of two decades, Brown University quietly deployed an expansive surveillance apparatus, unbeknownst to many in the community; it’s well past time we critically examined our University’s pervasive surveillance of College Hill,” John Wrenn wrote.
“It is impossible to cross (or even approach) Brown University without being surveilled,” he added. “I encourage you to try.”
The extent of that surveillance coverage is now under scrutiny amid the ongoing search for a gunman who killed two students and wounded nine others last Saturday before disappearing from the scene.
Law enforcement has released a series of videos from nearby homes and vehicles showing what the FBI has called an “unknown suspect,” but none of those appeared to come from Brown’s own surveillance cameras or from the building where the shooting took place. The shortage of visuals has led to sharp questions about surveillance at Brown.
“Why did Brown University have so few Security Cameras?” President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social just after midnight Wednesday. “There can be no excuse for that. In the modern age, it just doesn’t get worse!!!”
In fact, Brown University has an “expansive network of security cameras,” with more than 1,200 cameras installed in buildings with both interior and locations, university spokesperson Brian Clark said.
The problem, though, is the shooting took place at the very edge of the university in an older part of a building that has “fewer, if any” cameras, Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha said Tuesday. That left police to rely mainly on videos from the neighboring residential area to try to identify the person of interest.
“This building is on the literal edge of the campus, and the person of interest walked out the door (and) as soon as he stepped onto the sidewalk, was no longer on campus,” Providence Mayor Brett Smiley said.
“It’s part of the reason we keep asking for the community’s help so much, is because even though this occurred on campus, the route of travel and all of the video evidence you’ve seen, other than that very first video, has been video from off campus,” he said.
CNN spoke to several security experts to better understand the growth of Brown’s surveillance system, why its cameras failed to capture the attack or suspect, and the concerns about privacy and academic freedom that are the biggest resistance to their growing use.
“You would think that, ‘Hey it’s a school like Brown, they would have this investment, and they can figure out who this suspect is or at least help in identifying,’” said Glen Kucera, the president of the security company Allied Universal Enhanced Protection Services. “I’ve talked to a number of campuses across the country and some are more thorough in their surveillance system than others. Some have invested in it, and some haven’t.”
How many cameras is enough?
Like many modern institutions, Brown’s use of surveillance cameras has increased dramatically over the years. The university had just 60 surveillance cameras in 2000, a number that rose to Read more