Click on the Manage Content for adding and managing content.
Click on the Rotator Settings and choose what and how it will be displayed.

Two Married at First Sight UK wives claim they were raped by onscreen husbands

Kraig Pakulski 0 18 Article rating: No rating

By Christian Edwards, CNN

(CNN) — Two women have alleged they were raped during the filming of Married at First Sight UK, according to a BBC investigation that prompted Channel 4, a British broadcaster, to remove all previous seasons of the reality TV show while it reviews the allegations.

The show, known as MAFS, bills itself as a “bold social experiment” in which single people “marry” strangers who meet for the first time on their wedding day, although the marriage is not legally binding. The couples – while being filmed almost daily – then go on “honeymoon,” move in together and navigate their relationship.

A third woman has alleged she was subjected to a non-consensual sex act during the filming of the show. The three former participants told BBC Panorama, which broadcast an investigation into the allegations on Monday, that the show did not do enough to protect them.

The BBC claimed that Channel 4 was aware of some of the allegations before the MAFS series in question were broadcast and that the episodes featuring the women had been available on its streaming service until recently.

Channel 4 said it had removed all episodes of the show from its streaming and linear services, as well as from the MAFS social channels, and commissioned an external review.

“In April, Channel 4 was presented with serious allegations of wrongdoing against a small number of past contributors, allegations that we understand those contributors have denied,” it said.

“The channel is mindful of the privacy and continuing duty of care towards all contributors, and cannot comment on or disclose details of those allegations.”

The broadcaster said that when concerns about the welfare of the show’s participants were raised through its existing protocols, “prompt and appropriate action” was taken. “Channel 4 strongly refutes any claim to the contrary,” it added.

Priya Dogra, Channel 4’s chief executive, expressed her sympathy to the participants who had “clearly been distressed” after appearing on the show. “The wellbeing of our contributors is always of paramount importance.”

The show is part of a hugely successful international franchise spanning multiple countries, including the United States and Australia.

Lawyers for CPL, an independent production company that makes the British version, told the BBC its welfare system was industry-leading and “gold-standard,” and that it had acted appropriately in all of these cases.

In response to the BBC investigation, the British government’s Department for Culture, Media and Sport said the allegations are “serious” and that “everyone working and participating in television must be treated with dignity and respect at all times.” It warned there must be “consequences for criminality or wrongdoing.”

‘You can’t say no, you’re my wife’

One participant, whom the BBC did not name, said her onscreen husband raped her and threatened her with an acid attack.

She claimed that she noticed “red flags” about her partner on the show almost immediately, and that their sex soon turned violent. He would bruise her during sex, she said, even though she “kept saying stop.”

“We were in our apartment, on the sofa, and he tried to have sex with me. And I kept saying no, that I didn’t want to do it,” she said. “But he kept saying, ‘You can’t say no, you’re my wife.’ And he just did it anyway.”

Lawyers acting for the woman’s onscreen husband told the BBC that he denies rape and said that all sexual contact had been entirely consensual. They also said that he denies any violence or violent threats towards her.

Lawyers for CPL said the bruises were described to its welfare team at the time as the result of rough, but consensual sex. They said the woman did not tell the company about her partner telling her she “can’t say no” to him, and that she had re

Above & Beyond: Celebrating the 2026 Santa Barbara County Classified School Employees of the Year

Kraig Pakulski 0 10 Article rating: No rating
SBCEO recognizes the dedicated individuals from schools across our county who make campuses safe, beautiful, and welcoming spaces  Classified school employees are often the first to welcome students to school […]

The post Above & Beyond: Celebrating the 2026 Santa Barbara County Classified School Employees of the Year appeared first on edhat.

Carbajal, Moore Lead Bipartisan Effort to Support Transit Infrastructure in Mid‑Sized Cities

Kraig Pakulski 0 13 Article rating: No rating
U.S. Representatives Salud Carbajal (D-CA-24) and Blake Moore (R-UT-01) introduced the bipartisan Medium Transit Intensive Cities (MTIC) Authorization Act, a bill to provide more federal support for transportation infrastructure in medium-sized […]

The post Carbajal, Moore Lead Bipartisan Effort to Support Transit Infrastructure in Mid‑Sized Cities appeared first on edhat.

Funcionaria escolar ignoró advertencias de que un niño tenía un arma antes de dispararle a una maestra, dice fiscal en juicio

Kraig Pakulski 0 20 Article rating: No rating

Por Eric Levenson, CNN

Ebony Parker, quien se desempeñó como subdirectora de una escuela primaria de Virginia, no tomó ninguna medida tras escuchar varias advertencias de maestros de que un alumno de 6 años podría tener un arma de fuego, dijeron los fiscales en sus declaraciones de apertura de su juicio penal el martes.

“Solo había una persona en la escuela ese día que tenía tanto la autoridad para actuar como el conocimiento de la crisis en curso, y esa persona ustedes verán que era la Dra. Parker”, dijo el fiscal adjunto de la Commonwealth, Josh Jenkins.

En contraste, el abogado defensor de Parker replicó que Abby Zwerner, la maestra a la que el niño le disparó, pudo haber tenido sospechas de que había un arma de fuego, pero no actuó como si hubiera una crisis o un peligro inminente.

“Ella no actuó como si hubiera un arma presente”, dijo el abogado defensor Curtis Rogers. “Así que si ella pensaba que había un arma presente, entonces sus acciones deberían haber sido separar al niño… de sus compañeros de clase, o separar a los compañeros de clase (del niño). Ella no lo hizo”.

Las narrativas contrapuestas marcaron el inicio del juicio de Parker por ocho cargos de delito grave de abuso infantil y desprecio por la vida, uno por cada bala en el arma que utilizó el alumno. Los fiscales alegan que cometió “un acto u omisión deliberados en el cuidado de dichos estudiantes, de una manera tan grave, temeraria y culpable como para demostrar un desprecio imprudente por la vida humana”, según documentos judiciales.

Los cargos se derivan del tiroteo de enero de 2023 en la escuela primaria Richneck, en Newport News, Virginia, en el que el niño de 6 años, conocido como “JT”, llevó un arma a la escuela y le disparó a Zwerner, una maestra de primer grado, en el pecho y la mano.

Zwerner sobrevivió y subió al estrado el martes como la primera testigo de la fiscalía.

El juicio penal contra Parker es uno de varios casos en años recientes que han puesto a prueba los límites de quién es responsable cuando un menor lleva a cabo un tiroteo escolar. Padres en Michigan y Georgia han sido condenados por cargos graves, mientras que agentes del orden acusados de inacción en Parkland y Uvalde han sido absueltos por jurados.

Parker parece ser la primera educadora escolar en enfrentar un juicio en estas circunstancias.

Los fiscales alegan que Parker estaba al tanto de los problemas disciplinarios continuos del alumno, incluido un intento de estrangular a su maestra, Susan White, el año escolar anterior. Además, en las horas previas al tiroteo, varios maestros le dijeron a Parker que el niño podría tener un arma, pero Parker no tomó ninguna medida y aconsejó no registrar al niño en busca de un arma, según los fiscales.

Parker se ha declarado inocente de los cargos. Cada cargo se considera un delito grave de clase 6, castigado con hasta cinco años de prisión. Se espera que el juicio dure unos tres días.

El niño había tomado el arma, que no estaba asegurada, del bolso de su madre y la llevó a la escuela en su mochila, han dicho funcionarios.

Tras el hecho, varios funcionarios escolares perdieron sus empleos: Parker renunció dos semanas

RSS
First820821822823825827828829Last