Santa Barbara County News and Events

“Al límite de su capacidad”: nuevo escrutinio al Servicio Secreto tras ataque en la cena de corresponsales de la Casa Blanca

Kraig Pakulski 0 24 Article rating: No rating

Por Jeremy Herb, Jamie Gangel, Whitney Wild, Josh Campbell y Betsy Klein, CNN

El presidente Donald Trump, el secretario de Justicia interino y otros altos funcionarios de la administración afirman públicamente que el Servicio Secreto respondió según lo previsto cuando un hombre armado intentó irrumpir en la cena de la Asociación de Corresponsales de la Casa Blanca.

Pero entre bastidores, el incidente del sábado por la noche en el Washington Hilton, en el que el atacante intentó atravesar corriendo un control de seguridad antes de caer y ser reducido por las fuerzas del orden, ha reavivado las dudas sobre los problemas que arrastra desde hace tiempo el Servicio Secreto, como la escasez de personal, la presión sobre los agentes y el agotamiento.

Funcionarios actuales y antiguos del Servicio Secreto han declarado a CNN que los problemas de personal han afectado a la agencia durante años, a pesar de las promesas de solución.

“Tenemos recursos limitados y los utilizamos lo mejor que podemos”, declaró a CNN un exalto funcionario. “La realidad es que estamos sobrecargados y la agencia está constantemente intentando ponerse al día”.

Expertos en seguridad y legisladores expresaron a CNN su preocupación por las vulnerabilidades que el incidente puso de manifiesto.

Entre ellas, mencionaron los problemas de seguridad del propio hotel, así como la conveniencia de un perímetro de seguridad más amplio o la presencia de agentes adicionales en un evento donde se encontraban reunidos el presidente, el vicepresidente y la mayor parte del gabinete.

“Tras haber asistido a muchos eventos, y ciertamente a eventos con el presidente y el gabinete, la seguridad fue lamentablemente insuficiente cuando se trata de tanta gente entrando en una sala de ese tamaño”, comentó el representante Mike Lawler, republicano de Nueva York, a Manu Raju de CNN el domingo.

“El Servicio Secreto cumplió con su deber al interceptar al atacante, y lograron detenerlo. Pero no debería haber sido necesario llegar a eso”, añadió Lawler. “Para empezar, no debería haber estado en esa zona”.

Tras el intento de asesinato de Trump en 2024 en Butler, Pensilvania, y las investigaciones posteriores que expusieron importantes fallos del Servicio Secreto, surgió un impulso para contratar y capacitar a más agentes, según Jonathan Wackrow, exempleado del Servicio Secreto y analista de CNN que ha colaborado en los preparativos de la cena anual.

Pero en cambio, la administración Trump se centró en capacitar a nuevos agentes para el Servicio de Inmigración y Control de Aduanas (ICE) para su campaña de deportaciones, lo que creó un atasco en el Centro Federal de Capacitación para el Cumplimiento de la Ley, señaló Wackrow.

“El momento oportuno para hacerlo fue al comienzo de esta administración, cuando contábamos con el impulso generado por Butler y las recomendaciones bipartidistas”, agregó Wackrow. “Teníamos cierto apoyo presupuestario para impulsar una campaña de contratación y que esas personas avanzaran en el proceso. Pero entonces la atención se centró en ICE”.

Desde el tiroteo del sábado, altos funcionarios encargados de hacer cumplir la ley durante la administración Trump, incluyendo al secretario de Justicia interino Todd Blanche y al director del Servicio Secreto Sean Curran, han desestimado las preocupaciones sobre posibles fallas de seguridad.

“Fue un éxito rotundo en materia de seguridad”, declaró Blanche a Dana Bash de CNN el domingo. “Según lo que sabemos por las grabaciones de las cámaras de vigilancia y los testimonios de los testigos presentes, este

5 things to know for April 29: Free speech, King Charles, tornado devastation, Elon Musk, passports

Kraig Pakulski 0 24 Article rating: No rating

By Alexandra Banner, CNN

Gas prices have climbed to an average of $4.23 per gallon — the highest level since August 2022 — according to AAA. With oil futures rising and supply routes under strain, any near-term relief at the pump appears unlikely.

Here’s what else you need to know to get up to speed and on with your day.

1⃣ Free speech

The FCC is taking the remarkable step of challenging ABC’s station licenses as President Donald Trump again called on the network to take action against late-night host Jimmy Kimmel over a joke. Separately, the administration secured an indictment against former FBI Director James Comey over conduct that appears likely to be protected speech. Analysts say the moves could be seen as renewed attempts to punish foes after previous efforts failed. Read more.

2⃣ King Charles

Britain’s King Charles III and Queen Camilla will travel to New York City today to visit the 9/11 memorial and meet with families of victims. The visit follows the king’s historic address to Congress on Tuesday, marking only the second time a British monarch has spoken before the chamber. He also highlighted some issues that President Trump has sparred with Britain over in recent months, though much of his speech focused on the kinship between the US and the UK. Read more.

WATCH: Moments from King Charles’ speech to Congress that drew laughter

3⃣ Tornado devastation

Several people were injured after a tornado tore through Mineral Wells, Texas, on Tuesday night, flattening parts of the town as a dayslong severe storm outbreak continues to sweep across the Midwest and South. The storm struck the community about 80 miles west of Dallas, damaging multiple homes and a broad stretch of the town’s industrial area. Officials said a full assessment of the damage is expected later today. Read more.

4⃣ Elon Musk

Elon Musk testified Tuesday in a case that could shape the future of artificial intelligence. Musk is accusing ChatGPT’s parent company, OpenAI, and its leaders — CEO Sam Altman and president Greg Brockman — of misleading him and abandoning the company’s original nonprofit mission. Musk said his lawsuit reaches beyond a single company, arguing it touches on the broader direction of a technology he warned “could also kill us all.” Read more.

WATCH: Musk testifies: “We don’t want to have a ‘Terminator’ outcome.”

5⃣ Passports

The US will soon begin issuing passports featuring an image of President Trump inside. It appears to be the most prominent use yet of Trump’s likeness in items tied to the 250th anniversary of America’s independence, some analysts say. Unlike a commemorative coin or national park pass bearing the president’s image — some of which are already in circulation — a US passport is an internationally recognized form of identification that is typically valid for 10 y

Takeaways from day 1 of the Elon Musk and Sam Altman trial

Kraig Pakulski 0 27 Article rating: No rating

By Hadas Gold, Samantha Delouya, Ramishah Maruf, CNN

Oakland, California (CNN) — Sam Altman and Greg Brockman, the leaders of ChatGPT-maker OpenAI, sat in an Oakland, California courtroom on Tuesday as former collaborator and one-time mentor Elon Musk testified that the pair conspired to try to “steal a charity.”

Musk was the first witness called in his blockbuster case against OpenAI, a company he founded with Brockman and Altman, initially as an entirely nonprofit entity, more than a decade ago. But since then, OpenAI’s structure has shifted – and Musk, the richest man on earth, claims its executives and Microsoft have unjustly enriched themselves by straying from the company’s original charitable mission.

OpenAI says Musk’s suit is really about trying to squash a rival to his own artificial intelligence company, xAI.

Here are the most striking takeaways from Musk’s first day of testimony on Tuesday:

An AI company to ‘benefit humanity’

Musk testified Tuesday that he had believed that he was funding an organization that would be a “benefit for all of humanity.”

He framed the case in dire terms, arguing that losing the trial would “give license to looting every charity in America.” The trial’s outcome may also significantly change the AI landscape right as OpenAI, one of the world’s most valuable AI companies, plans a massive IPO.

OpenAI’s attorney, William Savitt, painted a different picture, claiming that Musk had pushed for a for-profit structure but left the company when he wasn’t able to exert total control. Musk brought the lawsuit to hobble OpenAI after he founded competitor xAI, Savitt argued.

Musk’s lawyer, Steven Molo, summed up the sheer notoriety of his client. “Everybody seems to know Mr. Musk, everybody has an opinion of Mr. Musk. Not every opinion is good, not every opinion is bad,” he said in his opening argument.

‘Extreme concerns’ over AI

Musk, dressed in a dark suit and tie, laid out why he got involved in an AI company back in 2015, saying he had worried about AI’s potential for years.

“I have extreme concerns over AI,” he told the jury, noting that it could make everyone prosperous, “but it could also kill us all.”

“We don’t want to have a ‘Terminator’ outcome,” he said, alluding to the movie franchise about a robot uprising against humanity.

Musk said Google co-founder Larry Page helped inspire the idea for OpenAI after Musk found him not “sufficiently caring about AI safety.”

“Larry Page called me a ‘speciesist’ for caring about humans more than AI,” Musk said Tuesday. CNN has reached out to Google for comment.

Musk said he thought there needed to be “some sort of counterpoint” to Google: “an open source nonprofit as opposed to a closed source for-profit.”

But since OpenAI created a for-profit subsidiary more than six years ago, it has largely shifted away from its open source model.

Musk said he came up with the name “OpenAI” because “open” stood for “open source.”

‘I came up with the idea’

Savitt, OpenAI’s lead attorney, said Musk had promised he would help OpenAI raise $1 billion but pulled the plug on the company when he was not allowed full control. He left the company for dead, Savitt said, and is only suing now that OpenAI turned out to be successful.

Savitt also suggested that while OpenAI’s other cofounders put in “sweat equity,” Musk showed up every few weeks to give advice and “occasionally yelled at people for not moving fast enough.”

Musk, however, said that he had an essential role from the outset.

Takeaways from day 1 of the Elon Musk and Sam Altman trial

Kraig Pakulski 0 23 Article rating: No rating
Elon Musk arrives at the US District Court in Oakland


KGO, VICKI BEHRINGER, CNN

By Hadas Gold, Samantha Delouya, Ramishah Maruf, CNN

Oakland, California (CNN) — Sam Altman and Greg Brockman, the leaders of ChatGPT-maker OpenAI, sat in an Oakland, California courtroom on Tuesday as former collaborator and one-time mentor Elon Musk testified that the pair conspired to try to “steal a charity.”

Musk was the first witness called in his blockbuster case against OpenAI, a company he founded with Brockman and Altman, initially as an entirely nonprofit entity, more than a decade ago. But since then, OpenAI’s structure has shifted – and Musk, the richest man on earth, claims its executives and Microsoft have unjustly enriched themselves by straying from the company’s original charitable mission.

OpenAI says Musk’s suit is really about trying to squash a rival to his own artificial intelligence company, xAI.

Here are the most striking takeaways from Musk’s first day of testimony on Tuesday:

An AI company to ‘benefit humanity’

Musk testified Tuesday that he had believed that he was funding an organization that would be a “benefit for all of humanity.”

He framed the case in dire terms, arguing that losing the trial would “give license to looting every charity in America.” The trial’s outcome may also significantly change the AI landscape right as OpenAI, one of the world’s most valuable AI companies, plans a massive IPO.

OpenAI’s attorney, William Savitt, painted a different picture, claiming that Musk had pushed for a for-profit structure but left the company when he wasn’t able to exert total control. Musk brought the lawsuit to hobble OpenAI after he founded competitor xAI, Savitt argued.

Musk’s lawyer, Steven Molo, summed up the sheer notoriety of his client. “Everybody seems to know Mr. Musk, everybody has an opinion of Mr. Musk. Not every opinion is good, not every opinion is bad,” he said in his opening argument.

‘Extreme concerns’ over AI

Musk, dressed in a dark suit and tie, laid out why he got involved in an AI company back in 2015, saying he had worried about AI’s potential for years.

“I have extreme concerns over AI,” he told the jury, noting that it could make everyone prosperous, “but it could also kill us all.”

“We don’t want to have a ‘Terminator’ outcome,” he said, alluding to the movie franchise about a robot uprising against humanity.

Musk said Google co-founder Larry Page helped inspire the idea for OpenAI after Musk found him not “sufficiently caring about AI safety.”

“Larry Page called me a ‘speciesist’ for caring about humans more than AI,” Musk said Tuesday. CNN has reached out to Google for comment.

Musk said he thought there needed to be “some sort of counterpoint” to Google: “an open source nonprofit as opposed to a closed source for-profit.”

But since OpenAI created a for-profit subsidiary more than six years ago, it has largely shifted a

El mensaje de Kimmel a Trump tras el desafío de la FCC a ABC: El espectáculo continúa

Kraig Pakulski 0 20 Article rating: No rating

Por Brian Stelter, CNN

El día en que la administración Trump impugnó las licencias de estaciones de ABC, Jimmy Kimmel tuvo un mensaje para el presidente Donald Trump: el show continúa.

En el episodio del martes por la noche de “Jimmy Kimmel Live!”, el comediante no hizo referencia a la noticia de que la empresa matriz de la cadena, Disney, estaba siendo objeto de un escrutinio sumamente inusual por parte del gobierno federal.

En cambio, el comediante recurrió a un monólogo satírico sobre la visita del rey Carlos III y la reina Camila a la Casa Blanca para subrayar la hipocresía de una broma que el presidente hizo sobre su matrimonio con la primera dama, Melania Trump.

Durante una ceremonia de bienvenida a los miembros de la realeza, Trump habló el martes sobre el matrimonio de 63 años de sus padres y, volviéndose hacia Melania, bromeó: “Ese es un récord que no vamos a poder igualar, cariño, lo siento”.

Aludiendo a la controversia por los comentarios que hizo la semana pasada sobre la primera dama, Kimmel preguntó en tono juguetón al público: “Un momento, ¿acaba de hacer una broma sobre su muerte?”

“Solo Donald Trump exigiría que me despidieran por hacer una broma sobre su vejez y luego, al día siguiente, salir y hacer una broma sobre su vejez”, dijo Kimmel.

Disney ha respaldado a Kimmel mientras el presidente, su esposa y sus asesores presionan para que ABC lo despida.

La directiva de la FCC a Disney emitida el martes no mencionó a Kimmel y, en cambio, sugirió que la impugnación de las licencias está relacionada con una investigación en curso de la FCC sobre las iniciativas de diversidad de Disney, a las que Trump se opone.

Pero la orden de que Disney debe empezar a intentar renovar las licencias de sus estaciones —años antes de lo previsto— es vista ampliamente como un acto de represalia.

Disney respondió diciendo que ha estado operando “en pleno cumplimiento de las normas de la FCC” y que “lo demostrará a través de los canales legales apropiados”. El comunicado de la compañía invocó la Primera Enmienda, lo que indica que está dispuesta a dar la pelea.

Los expertos dicen que Disney probablemente ganaría esa batalla si el Gobierno intenta revocar las ocho licencias que posee la compañía. El prolongado proceso legal de concesión de licencias podría alargarse durante años.

“Me alegra ver que Disney va a plantar cara, porque tiene la Primera Enmienda de su lado”, dijo en “Erin Burnett Outfront” de CNN la única comisionada demócrata de la FCC, Anna Gomez.

La controversia ha intensificado el interés público en los comentarios anti-Trump de Kimmel. El monólogo del lunes por la noche acumuló más de cuatro millones de visualizaciones en menos de 24 horas.

Todo el interés se debe al comentario de Kimmel en el episodio del jueves pasado, en el que dijo que la primera dama parecía una “futura viuda”.

“Fue un chiste muy suave, tipo roast, sobre el hecho de que él tiene casi 80 y ella es más joven que yo”, dijo Kimmel durante el programa del lunes por la noche, en respuesta a las críticas. (Donald Trump tiene 79 años; Melania Trump tiene 56).

Tras el tiroteo ocurrido el sábado pasado fuera de la cena de la Asociación de Corresponsales de la Casa Blanca, aliados de Trump han denunciado en voz alta a Kimmel y lo han acusado de querer que maten al presidente, una acusación que él ha rechazado.

“No fue, bajo ningun

RSS
First16821683168416851687168916901691Last