Gobierno de Trump indica a republicanos que dará marcha atrás con el millonario fondo contra la “instrumentalización”

Kraig Pakulski 0 2 Article rating: No rating

Por Kristen Holmes y Adam Cancryn, CNN

El Gobierno de Trump indicó a líderes republicanos del Congreso que planea abandonar el fondo de US$ 1.800 millones contra la “instrumentalización”, aunque se desconoce cuán firme o permanente es ese plan, según dos fuentes familiarizadas con el asunto.

El presidente de EE.UU. Donald Trump no se ha comprometido públicamente a tomar ninguna medida sobre el controvertido fondo de dinero, y una tercera fuente familiarizada con las discusiones indicó que el Gobierno solo suspendería las labores para impulsar el fondo, pero no abandonará esos planes por completo.

Esa caracterización coincide más con una declaración pública del Departamento de Justicia el lunes, que dijo que “acataría” un fallo de un tribunal federal que suspendió el fondo hasta al menos el 12 de junio. Una cuarta fuente familiarizada con el asunto dijo que el propio Trump todavía cree en el fondo, incluso cuando reconoce una fuerte reacción en contra del concepto.

El plan de dar marcha atrás con el fondo por ahora se produjo después de que Trump mantuviera una larga reunión con el presidente de la Cámara de Representantes, Mike Johnson, en la que el fondo “antiinstrumentalización” estuvo entre los temas que ambos discutieron. Pero se desconoce si el mensaje del Gobierno de Trump será suficiente para los legisladores republicanos, debido a que la furia por el fondo ha frenado la agenda más amplia del Partido Republicano.

Los líderes republicanos han estado luchando para aprobar financiamiento adicional para la aplicación de las leyes migratorias. Y el lunes, incluso el líder de la mayoría del Senado, John Thune, pidió al Gobierno que “lo cierre ellos mismos”, en referencia al fondo. Los esfuerzos continuos para sacar adelante esa legislación de gasto casi con certeza implicarán más intentos de eliminar de forma permanente el fondo contra la “instrumentalización”.

El senador republicano Rick Scott, de Florida, confirmó a los periodistas el lunes por la noche que un funcionario de la Casa Blanca le dijo que el fondo sería “eliminado”. No dijo con quién habló ni si la decisión de dejar de impulsar el fondo era temporal o permanente.

“He hablado con la Casa Blanca. Lo que me dijeron es que lo están eliminando”, dijo Scott.

No obstante, otros senadores republicanos no estaban convencidos.

“Si el Gobierno ha cambiado su posición sobre el fondo contra la instrumentalización, debería decirlo de manera definitiva, definitiva”, dijo el senador John Kennedy, de Louisiana. “Pero solo decir: ‘Vamos a acatar la orden judicial’, quiero decir, no puedo hablar por mis colegas, pero hablando personalmente, aquí no están hablando con el hermanito de Bambi. Decir que van a seguir una orden judicial no me dice nada. Tienen que seguir la orden judicial”.

La jueza federal fijó una audiencia para el 12 de junio para escuchar argumentos sobre si debería emitir una pausa más prolongada. Hasta entonces, le prohibió al Departamento de Justicia asignar dinero para crear el fondo, considerar cualquier reclamación o distribuir dinero a los solicitantes.

Se desconoce si el Gobierno de Trump seguirá luchando por el fondo en esa audiencia.

El controvertido fondo fue creado para resolver una demanda sin precedentes que Trump presentó contra el IRS por la divulgación no autorizada de sus declaraciones de impuestos hace años. Pero desde su anuncio, el fondo ha enfrentado semanas de rechazo implacable por parte del propio partido del presidente, tanto en público como en privado, y algunos dicen que es esencialmente un fondo discrecional para pagar a los aliados de Trump.

Al principio, altos funcionarios del Departamento de Justicia insistieron en que no cambiarían los detalles del fondo a pesar de la reacción en contra dentro del Partido Republicano, dijeron fuentes a CNN. Pero los republicanos del Congreso se han mantenido furiosos, y algunos al

Large Blob of Oil Comes Ashore on Several South Coast Beaches

Kraig Pakulski 0 1 Article rating: No rating

MONTECITO, Calif. (KEYT) - An unusual amount of oil, believed to be from a natural seep, ruined the ideal beach weekend for many people.

On Saturday, a significant amount was washing up at Butterfly Beach in Montecito. There were also reports at Hammonds to the south and nearby at Miramar Beach.

The Miramar Hotel also posted a sign for its guests to be aware of the excessive oil and tar in the water.

Sunday there was a report of a similar impact down the coast in the direction of the currents, with oil coming on the sand at Santa Claus Beach.

At the same time the non-profit, Heal the Ocean, set up a drone to take pictures of the oily mass which was clearly in the near shore waters.

Many people avoided the ways but the sand also had oil impacts that created a gooy situation.

Natural seeps are not unusual but large ones coming ashore is a messy situation for beach visitors, it is also unhealthy to the coastal environment.

Experts say a couple of weeks ago there was a large oil release from the offshore natural seep to the west of Isla Vista. That coated Sands and Coal Oil Point beaches.

Wind and wave data shows the currents went out and down the coast and now they have turned back to the shore.

The targets areas were Butterfly Beach across from the dormant Biltmore hotel and to the south near Carpinteria.

It's unknown if any marine life has been impacted.

(More details, video and photos will be added here later today.)

The Latest Breaking News, Weather Alerts, Sports and More Anytime On Our Mobile Apps. Keep Up With the Latest Articles by Signing Up for the News Channel 3-12 Newsletter.




The post Large Blob of Oil Comes Ashore on Several South Coast Beaches appeared first on News Channel 3-12.

New Mexico ‘Truth Commission’ begins investigation into Epstein’s Zorro Ranch, will issue subpoenas

Kraig Pakulski 0 0 Article rating: No rating

By MJ Lee, Nicky Robertson, CNN

(CNN) — A New Mexico legislative panel announced on Monday it is issuing more than a dozen subpoenas as a part of its probe into Jeffrey Epstein’s “Zorro Ranch,” and called on survivors of the late sex offender and other members of the public to share what they might know about Epstein’s past crimes in the state.

“The New Mexico Survivor’s Truth Commission,” led by a bipartisan group of four lawmakers from New Mexico’s House of Representatives, said it will begin collecting evidence from a range of federal and local agencies including the US Justice Department, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Epstein’s estate, several major banks, the state’s Department of Justice and the Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Department.

“Our aim is to repair the body politic that was violated in New Mexico, in this country, and around the world by one man’s predation, and by the silence and complicity and failures of many individuals and institutions by the power to stop it, and did not,” Democratic Rep. Andrea Romero, the chair of the commission, said. “We will not be the next ones who had the power to act and chose not to.”

The committee also plans on physically surveying the ranch, speaking with survivors and coordinating with local and federal law enforcement, as well as US Congress, culminating with a final report on its findings, the lawmakers said Monday.

The next update will come in July. It was not clear exactly what kinds of evidence the commission will be seeking from these entities and how successful it will be in obtaining the information.

Monday’s developments mark one more example of the growing calls to investigate and get to the bottom of the full extent of the late sex offender’s crimes — years after Epstein’s death.

Zorro Ranch, a sprawling piece of property outside of Santa Fe and one of multiple homes that Epstein owned, has been the source of much speculation and conspiracy theories about Epstein’s abuse of young women and girls. Some of Epstein’s survivors, including Chauntae Davies and the late Virginia Giuffre, have said the ranch was one of the places where Epstein sexually assaulted them.

“I experienced a lot of trauma personally there, and it was a very isolated location to be at and it was a very scary place,” Davies told CNN in a recent interview. “You could feel the darkness there.”

The Justice Department’s recent release of millions of pages of Epstein files has fueled fresh calls from survivors, advocates, lawmakers and others to probe why for decades, local and federal law enforcement had failed to thoroughly examine Epstein’s vast sex-trafficking ring and those who aided him, including what might have transpired at Zorro Ranch.

Epstein’s co-conspirator, Ghislaine Maxwell, is the only person who has ever been prosecuted in relation to Epstein. She is currently serving a sentence at a minimum-security prison camp in Texas.

New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez said in February that he was re-opening the state’s criminal investigation into Epstein’s activities in Zorro Ranch and has been soliciting information from the public who might have knowledge about the matter. On the heels of that announcement, state authorities conducted their own physical search of the ranch in March. It’s not clear what pertinent evidence, if any, was found during that search.

The Truth Commission recently launched a new website that includes what it says is a confidential tip line and information about its ongoing work. The panel says it has a $2 million budget and plans to coordinate with the state’s Justice Department.

“We deserve answers, we deserve the truth, we deserve transparency, justice and accountability,” Epstein survivor Rach

RSS
First9091929395979899Last