Click on the Manage Content for adding and managing content.
Click on the Rotator Settings and choose what and how it will be displayed.

Woman who schemed to lure vulnerable migrants to US for sex work pleads guilty

Kraig Pakulski 0 37 Article rating: No rating

By Hannah Rabinowitz, CNN

(CNN) — Several years ago, a family came to the United States and took up a terrifying new endeavor: smuggling young, poor women from Central and South America into the country and forcing them into prostitution.

The scheme was rather straightforward, according to court documents. One or two members of the family would contact women abroad and offer them resources to illegally immigrate and a legitimate job when they arrived. All the women needed to do was pay back their travel fees.

But once they were on the way, the women were told that price had increased, often by tens of thousands of dollars. The women felt they had no choice but to agree to engage in commercial sex and hand over the proceeds, prosecutors said.

On Wednesday, the ringleader of the operation — and the matriarch of the family — pleaded guilty to three conspiracy charges: sex trafficking, conspiring to bring illegal aliens into the US for financial gain, and money laundering.

The woman, Yilibeth del Carmen Rivero-De Caldera, faces up to life in prison.

The victims are young people who “think they’re coming to America for some type of opportunity for a better life,” Tysen Duva, who runs the Justice Department’s criminal division, told CNN. “They want to get here. They want to leave from where they come from. They’re going to pay money to do it. But what they don’t realize is the sex debt they’re going to be incurring when they get here.”

CNN has reached out to Rivero-De Caldera’s attorney for comment, as well as the attorneys for her eight codefendants, who have all pleaded guilty.

“As a young teenager, my client walked through and survived the jungles of the Darien Gap seeking refuge and a better future,” said Meggan Sullivan, the attorney for one of Rivero-De Caldera’s daughters-in-law. “Instead, she became the victim of a family of traffickers who groomed and controlled her” until she joined their scheme, Sullivan said.

“Before we judge survivors, we have to understand the extraordinary vulnerabilities traffickers deliberately exploit,” Sullivan continued. “We cannot understand these cases unless we understand the trauma, coercion, and survival that define them.”

The scheme

According to court documents, Rivero-De Caldera, a Venezuelan national, entered the United States in 2022 and jump-started the trafficking operation out of motels in Nashville, Tennessee.

Prosecutors allege that within a year, Rivero-De Caldera’s two sons, daughter, and their partners also entered the country and joined the scheme, as did two associates.

The group allegedly sent travel money to victims, hired smugglers to help them enter the US, and sometimes even escorted victims into the country and to Tennessee.

When they arrived, the victims were surveilled on a “near-constant basis” to ensure they didn’t escape, court documents say. Their immigration documents were often withheld. Some victims told investigators they believed Rivero-De Caldera and one of her sons were connected to Tren de Aragua, a cartel and US-designated terrorist organization, and worried the gang would hurt their families if they refused to comply, according to the documents.

One victim highlighted in court documents said she traveled through multiple countries by bus and on foot before she entered the United States. But during her journey, the woman, who is not named by prosecutors, was allegedly told she was going to be fined $35,000 because she was bringing along her 5-year-old daughter.

Because the woman couldn’t afford to pay that additional fee, she began working in commercial sex, prosecutors say, adding that she was repeatedly warned that there would be consequences should she try to escape before she had fully paid her debt.

When law enforcement arrived to arrest one

Las desventajas de hacer permanente el horario de verano en EE.UU.

Kraig Pakulski 0 42 Article rating: No rating

Análisis de Aaron Blake, CNN

Una de las frases más célebres sobre la política es la del estadista alemán Otto von Bismarck, quien afirmó que es “el arte de lo posible”.

Sin embargo, cuando se trata del horario de verano, quizá resulte más apropiada una versión del economista John Kenneth Galbraith, quien escribió en una carta de 1962 al presidente John F. Kennedy: “La política no es el arte de lo posible. Consiste en elegir entre lo desastroso y lo desagradable”.

El Congreso de Estados Unidos vuelve a considerar eliminar el cambio de hora que se realiza dos veces al año, esta vez haciendo permanente el horario de verano. La Cámara de Representantes aprobó el martes esa propuesta por una amplia mayoría de 308 votos contra 117.

No obstante, en muchos sentidos, este debate ejemplifica cómo el populismo político puede llevar a soluciones simplistas.

¿Cambiar el reloj dos veces al año es molesto y no nos gusta? Entonces, simplemente dejemos de hacerlo. Si el sistema actual es malo, la alternativa necesariamente debe ser mejor.

De hecho, a juzgar por algunos de los defensores de esta iniciativa, se trata de una medida prácticamente sin costo y sin consecuencias negativas evidentes.

Después de todo, la propuesta se llama Ley de Protección de la Luz Solar (Sunshine Protection Act, en inglés). ¿Quién podría oponerse a proteger la luz del sol? El presidente de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, quien respalda la iniciativa, escribió en mayo que esta daría a las personas “un día más largo y más luminoso”.

“¿Y quién podría estar en contra de eso?”, añadió.

La realidad es que muchas personas sí pueden estarlo. Así ocurrió cuando Estados Unidos intentó implementar esta medida en la década de 1970. Los estadounidenses recordaron rápidamente por qué el país había comenzado a cambiar la hora en primer lugar y la opinión pública cambió de forma radical.

En medio de una crisis energética, el presidente Richard Nixon propuso hacer permanente el horario de verano durante los dos inviernos siguientes para ahorrar energía. El cambio se aplicó rápidamente durante el invierno de 1973-1974.

Sin embargo, las encuestas mostraron que el apoyo cayó de forma pronunciada. Datos del Centro Nacional de Investigación de Opinión de la Universidad de Chicago indicaron que el 79 % apoyaba la medida en diciembre, pero esa cifra descendió al 42 % en febrero. Otros sondeos mostraron una caída aún mayor.

Según un estudio posterior del Departamento de Transporte de Estados Unidos, la medida en realidad no produjo un ahorro significativo de energía. Pero sí provocó otros efectos que resultaron problemáticos.

Entre ellos, como escribió en 2005 el investigador Michael Downing, especializado en el horario de verano, figuraban el desfase con los horarios de Europa, las dificultades para cumplir rituales religiosos vinculados al amanecer y, en contra de la creencia popular, el hecho de que la medida tampoco era bien recibida por los agricultores.

No obstante, el principal problema fueron las largas mañanas frías y oscuras que generó. Aunque los defensores del horario de verano permanente sostienen que aumenta las horas d

Takeaways from Blanche and Clayton hearings: Fund for Trump allies and 2020 election at the forefront

Kraig Pakulski 0 45 Article rating: No rating

By Hannah Rabinowitz, Katie Bo Lillis, Holmes Lybrand, Katelyn Polantz, Devan Cole, CNN

(CNN) — In twin hearings Wednesday, two nominees integral to executing President Donald Trump’s agenda worked to convince senators that they were up to the task: Todd Blanche for attorney general, and Jay Clayton to lead the US Intelligence community.

The men faced intense scrutiny from the Senate Judiciary and Intelligence committees on whether they could properly steer some of the federal government’s most critical divisions.

Blanche has a razor thin margin of error, as even a single Republican no-vote in committee could tank his nomination. That left him to walk a careful line between calmly assuring Republicans that he will continue his aggressive tenure at the Justice Department but without political interference from the president.

And though he appeared to achieve that goal, some Republicans still said Wednesday that they hadn’t made a final decision.

Clayton, who is currently the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York — Blanche’s former office — also faced tense questions about the winner of the 2020 election and a set of controversial subpoenas Clayton signed for New York Times journalists.

Here are takeaways from the hearings:

Projecting calm

Blanche focused on staying calm and deflecting tough questions from Democrats and a few skeptical Republicans, emphasizing he could serve as attorney general without White House political interference — despite the fact he was previously Trump’s personal attorney.

Overall, he stuck to this strategy. Unlike his predecessor, Pam Bondi, who was known for fiery, prepared responses, Blanche largely avoided relying on notes and handled attacks confidently.

There were some tense exchanges with Democratic Sens. Cory Booker and Adam Schiff. Booker, for instance, tried to push an argument about whether Blanche attended a private dinner with Paramount chairman David Ellison while the Justice Department was reviewing Paramount’s planned takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery, which owns CNN. Blanche snapped: “You won’t even let me answer the question, man.”

Earlier, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, a Rhode Island Democrat, used his time to criticize FBI Director Kash Patel and asked whether Blanche would allow Patel’s alleged misconduct, including misuse of FBI aircraft, to continue. Blanche replied, “That’s an extraordinarily obnoxious question, Senator.”

For Clayton, testy exchanges — particularly over election-related responses — exasperated lawmakers. Still, the overall tenor of the hearing suggested that his nomination is on track.

Clayton is also boosted by the man Trump chose as acting director, Bill Pulte, who has drawn bipartisan alarm over his complete lack of national security experience, and Democrats have been keen to keep his tenure short.

‘Anti-weaponization Fund’ key to GOP support

Two of the Justice Department’s most controversial efforts were front and center at Blanche’s hearing: the Epstein saga and the anti-weaponization fund.

Some conservatives say they’re still deciding whether to back Blanche after he signed the nearly $1.8 billion fund, an effort critics warned could finance allies of the president, including some who stormed the Capitol.

Blanche insisted that “the weaponization fund is dead,” and said that the tax addendum — which is the only part of the agreement between Trump’s personal attorneys and the Justice Department still stands — “binds only the IRS and by extension the Treasury” from investigating the president for potential crimes, not other agencie

RSS
First287288289290292294295296Last