Click on the Manage Content for adding and managing content.
Click on the Rotator Settings and choose what and how it will be displayed.

Empresa de Trump invierte en fusión nuclear por US$ 6 mil millones. El acuerdo plantea serias preocupaciones éticas

Kraig Pakulski 0 55 Article rating: No rating

Por Matt Egan, CNN

La expansión del imperio empresarial de Trump hacia la fusión nuclear ha encendido las alarmas de los expertos en ética, quienes advierten que la misma plantea graves conflictos de intereses y podría implicar que el Gobierno federal haga favoritismos en lo que podría ser el santo grial de la energía limpia.

Trump Media & Technology Group (DJT) sorprendió a Wall Street la semana pasada al concertar una fusión de US$ 6 mil millones con TAE Technologies, una empresa respaldada por Google y líder en energía de fusión.

La compra implica que muy pronto el presidente Donald Trump tendrá un importante interés financiero en una empresa cuyo futuro se verá influenciado por las acciones de un Gobierno que él mismo preside.

Las empresas de fusión nuclear están reguladas por el Gobierno federal y probablemente necesiten una profunda investigación de su parte y aún más recursos para ser comercialmente viables. La fusión debe ser aprobada por los reguladores federales, algunos de los cuales fueron nominados por Trump.

“Existe un claro conflicto de intereses”, declaró a CNN Richard Painter, el principal funcionario de ética del expresidente George W. Bush. “Todos los demás presidentes desde la Guerra Civil se han desprendido de sus intereses comerciales en conflicto con sus funciones oficiales. El presidente Trump ha hecho lo contrario”.

Painter, quien ahora es profesor en la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Minnesota, afirmó que cualquier persona que no sea el presidente o el vicepresidente podría estar cometiendo un delito si participara en un asunto del Gobierno estadounidense en el que supiera que tiene un interés financiero.

Por ejemplo, indicó que el secretario de energía tendría que recusarse de cualquier asunto relacionado con la fusión si simultáneamente tuviera una participación significativa en una empresa de fusión.

“Es legal solo porque la ley de conflicto de intereses penal no se aplica al presidente”, afirmó Painter, y añadió que, si bien es “técnicamente legal”, no cree que los presidentes deban estar exceptuados.

El acuerdo de fusión provocó un aumento inmediato en el patrimonio neto de Trump.

El precio de las acciones de Trump Media se disparó un 42 % tras el anuncio de la fusión del jueves. Esto incrementó el valor de la participación que Trump posee a través de un fideicomiso en US$ 500 millones, hasta los US$ 1.700 millones. El precio de las acciones de Trump Media continuó subiendo el viernes, lo que elevó el valor de dicha participación a más de US$ 1.800 millones.

Algunos en Wall Street apuestan a que el acuerdo creará un efecto halo para TAE.

En nuestra opinión, TAE “cuenta claramente con un importante apoyo político del presidente Trump, lo que, de manera importante, creará una importante apuesta nacional por la energía de fusión nuclear en Estados Unidos en los próximos años”, declaró Dan Ives, veterano analista tecnológico de Wedbush Securities, a sus clientes en una nota la semana pasada.

La fusión es una forma futurista de energía que pretende replicar el mismo proceso que alimenta al sol y a otras estrellas. Desde hace tiempo se ha considerado un potencial punto de inflexión, ya que podría proporcionar energía limpia casi ilimitada.

Sin embargo, la fusión aún no es comercialmente viable, y para que despegue podría necesitar apoyo del Gobierno federal en forma de préstamos, subsidios, contratos e investigación.

Por eso, el interés público podría verse perjudicado si la fusión crea una ventaja injusta para TAE, respaldada por Trump, preocupa a Kathleen Clark, profesora de derecho en la Universidad de Washington en St. Louis, quien estudia ética gubernamental.

“El riesgo es que una empresa termine siendo la favorita del Gobierno, no por una evaluación científica objetiva, sino porque sobornó al presidente”, dijo Clark. “Me recuerda a la U

Massive sinkhole in England swallows canal boats, sparking rescue operation

Kraig Pakulski 0 54 Article rating: No rating

By Billy Stockwell, CNN

(CNN) — A massive sinkhole has developed in a canal in the English county of Shropshire, trapping two boats in deep mud and prompting emergency services to declare a “major incident.”

An image released by Shropshire Fire and Rescue Service shows the two canal boats trapped in the sinkhole – which measures approximately 50 by 50 meters (approximately 164 square feet) – while a third boat leans over the sinkhole’s slope.

Canal boats are long vessels designed to navigate Britain’s system of narrow canals. Historically, the boats were used to transport cargo but have since evolved into floating homes and are also used for recreational purposes.

Rescue teams responded to a “significant breach” of the Shropshire Union Canal in Whitchurch, a historic market town near the Welsh border, Shropshire Fire and Rescue Service said Monday.

A “major incident” was declared at 5.17 a.m., but the situation was later declared “stable,” said Scott Hurford, Area Manager at the service. Search and rescue activity has since ended, he added.

No individuals are currently believed to be on board the affected boats and no injuries have been reported, he said.

Shropshire Fire and Rescue Service said rescue crews had been working in challenging conditions due to unstable ground and “rapidly moving water,” but managed to bring more than 10 members of the public to safety. The service didn’t provide further information about those people.

Emergency services asked the public to avoid the area while teams continue to deal with the incident.

The Canal and River Trust, the largest canal charity in the United Kingdom, said Monday that it was carrying out “initial investigations into the possible cause of the breach and will provide more details in due course.”

“Our teams are on site and have dammed off the affected section of (the) canal. The priority is the safety of boaters and those in the immediate area,” the charity said in a statement.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2025 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

The post Massive sinkhole in England swallows canal boats, sparking rescue operation appeared first on News Channel 3-12.

Paramount’s new, hostile offer to Warner Bros. Discovery: Larry Ellison will personally guarantee $40 billion

Kraig Pakulski 0 69 Article rating: No rating

By David Goldman, CNN

(CNN) — Paramount has upped the ante in its hostile takeover bid for Warner Bros. Discovery, announcing Monday that Larry Ellison will personally guarantee the tens of billions of dollars he is putting up to bankroll the transaction. The Ellisons will also let shareholders peer into the finances of their family trust.

The Warner Bros. board of directors has rejected Paramount’s bid multiple times, opting instead to go with an offer from Netflix, which WBD says is more valuable. The board also said Paramount has misrepresented itself to WBD shareholders, calling into question the legitimacy of the deal’s “illusory” proposed financing.

To counteract that critique, Paramount said Oracle founder Larry Ellison – the father of Paramount CEO David Ellison – will guarantee all $40.4 billion of the equity he’s putting up to finance the $78 billion deal. That’s a big guarantee, putting Larry Ellison on the hook for about a sixth of his roughly $250 billion net worth if something falls through.

Larry Ellison also agreed not to revoke his family trust, which could have complicated the potential financing of the deal, and Paramount is publishing records that confirm the trust owns 1.16 billion Oracle shares, which the WBD board called into question.

Paramount also upped its breakup fee to $5.8 billion from $5 billion, matching Netflix’s promised payment to Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders if the deal were to fall through.

One aspect of Paramount’s offer that hasn’t changed: its overall value.

Paramount offered $30 per share for WBD, including CNN and the rest of its cable channels. Netflix offered $27.75 per share for Warner Bros. and HBO. But Netflix and WBD argue that plans to spin off the cable assets will increase those stations’ overall value and will, in total, value the company more highly than Paramount’s deal.

WBD’s board will be expected to respond to Paramount’s revised offer. Because the changes address some but not all of WBD’s concerns, it’s not clear that the board will change its mind.

But shareholders also have a say, and the hostile nature of Paramount’s offer mean that owners of WBD’s stock could reject the board’s recommendation.

The Paramount offer is financed in large part by the royal families of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Abu Dhabi, and WBD’s board has raised concerns about why Larry Ellison, one of the world’s richest people, needs so much help to bankroll the deal.

Paramount has said it has “air tight financing,” and David Ellison has publicly called WBD “absurd” for questioning whether or not the deal’s backers are good for the money.

WBD (WBD) shares jumped 4% Monday. Paramount (PSKY) shares rose 3% and Netflix’s (NFLX) stock was unchanged.

This story has been updated with additional developments and context.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2025 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

The post Paramount’s new, hostile offer to Warner Bros. Discovery: Larry Ellison will personally guarantee $40 billion appeared first on News Channel 3-12.

Avanza con lentitud el escrutinio especial en Honduras tras una nueva interrupción: falta contar cerca de 1.500 actas

Kraig Pakulski 0 42 Article rating: No rating

Por Gonzalo Zegarra y Elvin Sandoval, CNN Español

El candidato del Partido Nacional, Nasry “Tito” Asfura, apoyado por Donald Trump, continúa liderando el conteo de votos en Honduras, con un escrutinio especial que avanza con lentitud a ocho días de que venza el plazo legal para que el Consejo Nacional Electoral (CNE) oficialice los resultados.

Mientras falta de revisar 1.540 actas con inconsistencias, Asfura se mantiene en el primer lugar, con el 40,34 %, frente al 39,49 % de Salvador Nasralla, una distancia de 29.446 votos. La ventaja se estiró levemente en las últimas actualizaciones, aunque sigue siendo reversible para el candidato del Partido Liberal.

En el tercer lugar sigue la aspirante oficialista Rixi Moncada, con 19,16 %.

El escrutinio especial comenzó el jueves 18 con cinco días de retraso, en un ambiente cada vez más tenso entre denuncias de Nasralla y Moncada sobre la transparencia del proceso y diferencias entre los tres consejeros del CNE.

Entre el sábado y el domingo, el escrutinio estuvo paralizado durante unas 12 horas. Hasta antes de ese incidente, las autoridades proyectaban que los resultados finales estén listos entre el lunes y martes, pero el proceso no avanza al ritmo necesario para esa meta.

Marlon Ochoa, consejero de Libre, transmitió en redes sociales las sesiones virtuales del pleno del órgano electoral y puso en evidencia las diferencias entre sus miembros. Allí, les reprochó a Ana Paola Hall, presidenta del organismo, y a Cossette López, quienes representan a los partidos Liberal y Nacional, respectivamente, que no encendieran sus cámaras. López le recordó que EE.UU. le impuso restricciones de visado.

La noche del sábado, López denunció intentos partidarios por obstruir el escrutinio y exigió “de manera respetuosa pero firme la actuación inmediata de las Fuerzas Armadas, en su calidad de garantes del proceso electoral”.

Por su parte, Nasralla viene denunciando presuntas irregularidades en la contabilización de actas, mientras que Asfura pidió el sábado respetar la decisión soberana y dejar de “incurrir en delitos electorales”.

El CNE tiene por ley hasta el 30 de diciembre para dar a conocer los resultados oficiales de los comicios. Si para entonces no hay una declaración del CNE, el asunto sería enviado al Congreso, donde el titular Luis Redondo, del oficialismo, no ha convocado a sesiones del pleno desde finales de agosto.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2025 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Con información de la agencia EFE

The post Avanza con lentitud el escrutinio especial en Honduras tras una nueva interrupción: falta contar cerca de 1.500 actas appeared first on News Channel 3-12.

‘So, like, um,’ should I be using filler words?

Kraig Pakulski 0 89 Article rating: No rating

By Gina Park, CNN

(CNN) — As someone who’s originally from Southern California and now lives in the South, it’s not uncommon for me to get Valley girl comments.

I have a habit of throwing in a quick “you know, like” or “so like” in between every few sentences.

Those are called “filler words,” which are defined as words, sounds or phrases that we use, often unintentionally, to fill pauses when we don’t know what to say.

I use them so often that I don’t process how many times I’m saying them. In fact, most of us probably aren’t counting the amount of filler words we use in a sentence (but I bet you’re counting now).

There is even an ongoing TikTok trend, in which online users like Aleeya Hutchins and John Spina try to speak for one to three minutes straight without using any filler words.

“It’s difficult for us to be in the present moment and speak freely without taking pauses,” Hutchins said in her video.

“Every time I see this trend on my ‘for you’ page, it looks really easy, but every participant in this challenge sounds like they’re suffocating on every word,” Spina said in his video.

I feel it, too. Many of these videos are filled with comments from people expressing discomfort, anxiety or even anger at the number of pauses participants trying to avoid filler words are taking.

Pausing is just one of the many ways people are advised to cut filler words from their speech. Other methods include taking a deep breath or speaking only after formulating a full thought.

So, like, do you really want to remove those filler words from your speech? What are they there for? One expert told me that constantly trying to stop myself from saying filler words could worsen my communication with others.

Where do filler words come from?

If you’ve ever spoken to people from different regions or even been online, you’ve probably noticed that different people use different filler words.

More known regional accents include the Valley girl accent, which involves repetitive use of the words “like,” “totally” and “whatever.” A newer version, known as influencer-speak or TikTok voice, involve “you know” and “vibe.”

Everyone speaks differently and we know that, but where are these filler words coming from?

This is a hard question to answer because we’ve always used filler words.

“Filler words are part of your mental dictionary, even things like um or uh,” said Dr. Idan Blank, assistant professor of psychology and linguistics at the University of California, Los Angeles.

Although most people might not think of filler words as words, “it is a word as far as our mind is concerned,” he added. “And so, if you, as an individual, want to use a filler word, which filler word you use is the one that you’ve used the most. Because that’s the one that is easiest for you to pull out.”

If you take that to a larger, regional scale, you get things like the Valley girl accent, which is created by cultural comfort with certain filler words.

“The way we use language changes from speaker to speaker, and some ways of speaking get conventionalized. We all want to be able to communicate, so we often mimic the way other people speak. And of course, a big part of language is habits,” Blank said.

Why do we use filler words?

There are two main goals in language: delivering information and having that information be understood, whether that’s factually or emotionally.

The easiest way to do this is through speech. By talking to people, we can build a rhythm that allows us to achieve these goals, and filler words can be a great tool in maintaining conversational momentum.

RSS
First41724173417441754177417941804181Last