Santa Barbara County News and Events

El suministro eléctrico de Cuba comienza lentamente a restablecerse tras el apagón total

Kraig Pakulski 0 16 Article rating: No rating

Por CNN Español

El sistema eléctrico de Cuba comienza a restablecerse tras el colapso total de este lunes. La recuperación es lenta, como sucede cuando hay apagones de esta magnitud.

Según el UNE, el operador de la red eléctrica cubana, el servicio ya se restableció en las regiones occidental y centro-oriental de la isla luego de la reconexión de algunas centrales eléctricas.

Las centrales eléctricas de los municipios de Diez de Octubre y Carlos Manuel de Céspedes volvieron a funcionar este martes, al igual que los sistemas del centro-oeste y del centro, según la UNE.

En tanto, la energía volvió en algunas partes de La Habana, aunque la mayor parte de la capital cubana sigue sin electricidad.

El colapso total del lunes fue el primero a nivel nacional desde que EE.UU. bloqueó el suministro de petróleo a la isla de unos 10 millones de habitantes. Pero los cortes de energía se vienen sucediendo con frecuencia en Cuba en los últimos años. El Gobierno cubano lo ha atribuido a las sanciones estadounidenses, aunque analistas señalan también la falta de inversión en un sistema de por sí deteriorado.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Con información de Patrick Oppmann, de CNN, y de la agencia Reuters.

The post El suministro eléctrico de Cuba comienza lentamente a restablecerse tras el apagón total appeared first on News Channel 3-12.

St. Patrick myth-busting, from snakes to pagan nipples

Kraig Pakulski 0 14 Article rating: No rating

By Maureen O’Hare, CNN

(CNN) — For many around the world, St. Patrick’s Day is a celebration of green beer, fiddle music, and the best holiday after Halloween for wearing a silly hat and throwing up in the street.

For me, though, as a child growing up in the Northern Irish town of Downpatrick, the saint’s traditional burial place, it was a pious affair of Mass in the morning, wearing an Aran-knit jumper and a wilting badge of shamrock, then a day off school.

So who then was the real St. Patrick, whose legacy contains such multitudes?

In the 1,600 years since this Christian missionary and bishop made his mark in Ireland, the cult and mythology surrounding him has overtaken the man himself.

To mark St. Patrick’s Day on March 17, here are a few surprising things you might not know about him.

1. He wasn’t Irish

Patrick was born into a Christian family in Britain in the late fourth century, when the Roman Empire was in decline and had become vulnerable to raids from beyond its borders.

His comfortable life as a deacon’s son was disrupted at the age of 16 when he was captured and enslaved by Irish raiders, spending the next years as a shepherd on a remote, often freezing hillside.

Remarkably for the fifth century, he left two written accounts from his life, but “he’s not very great with specifics,” says historian Fin Dwyer, host of The Irish History Podcast and Transatlantic: An Irish American History Podcast. “He does mention place names, but obviously they’ve changed.”

Some argue he was a slave on Slemish Mountain in the northern county of Antrim, others say Killala Bay in the western county of Mayo.

“These things are important to historians,” says Dwyer, but “no one’s ever going to definitely prove this.”

2. He escaped slavery, then came back

In his early 20s, Patrick fled his captors and made it back to his family in Britain, but soon he was hankering to get back to Ireland and spread the Christian message.

“For some unknown reason, he decided to punish himself all over again and come back,” says Duane Fitzsimons, a tour guide in my home town of Downpatrick, on the Lecale peninsula. The area has many sites closely associated with Patrick’s life and is home to the Saint Patrick Centre, the world’s only permanent exhibition to Ireland’s patron saint.

He is also, we discover at the end of our interview, my second-cousin-once-removed, because sometimes the cliché about all Irish people knowing each other turns out to be true.

“He lands somewhere on the northern shore of Lecale” and is discovered by Dichu, the brother of one of the local kings, says Fitzsimons.

“It’s an odd thing, because they seem to put a lot of trust into Patrick, and back then, these kings would have been the figurehead of their society” and they took a big risk by backing him.

“If anything failed within their societies, say if the crops failed for a year or a sudden illness took the livestock, their heads were the ultimate price for this,” he adds.

Patrick was given a barn for shelter in the village of Saul outside Downpatrick. That became the site of his first church and still attracts pilgrims today.

3. He didn’t convert Ireland to Christianity single-handedly

“It’s not a story of ‘one man comes and converts an island that was then divided into dozens of kingdoms.’ It would have been physically impossible,” says Dwyer.

While Patrick wasn’t the first Christian missionary in Ireland (that was Palladius in the early fifth century), he was the most successful.

The Dál Riata, in Irel

Potentially toxic ‘forever chemicals’ may harm adolescent bone health

Kraig Pakulski 0 14 Article rating: No rating

By Kristen Rogers, CNN

(CNN) — The “forever chemicals” known as PFAS are increasingly known to potentially pose many threats, the latest of which may be child bone health, according to a new study.

Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, are a class of about 15,000 synthetic chemicals commonly used in products such as clothing, nonstick cookware, firefighting foams, food packaging, carpets, cleaning products, paints, and stain and water repellents. These compounds do not break down in the environment and can easily migrate into the air, dust, food and soil, also contaminating nearly half the drinking water in the United States.

Notably, PFAS accumulate in our bodies and have been found in the blood of people of all ages, including newborns.

“After you’re born, you start to accrue bone density, and you do it really rapidly through adolescence,” said Dr. Jessie Buckley, first author of the small study published Tuesday in the Journal of the Endocrine Society. “Then after around age 20 or so, you have reached all the bone density you’ll ever get, and it’s all downhill after that.”

“We found that PFAS chemical exposure in children tended to be related to lower bone strength when they’re young teens,” added Buckley, professor in the department of epidemiology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. “This was particularly true for one chemical, PFOA. It didn’t really matter when the exposure happened; it was consistently related to lower bone density, particularly in their forearm.”

Part of the PFAS class, PFOA is perfluorooctanoic acid — historically one of the most widely used and studied PFAS chemicals in the US.

The findings suggest “these chemicals may be causing folks to not reach their genetic potential for bone density,” potentially raising risk for fractures and osteoporosis in older adulthood, Buckley said.

Hundreds of studies have linked PFAS exposure with serious health problems, including cancers, endocrine disruption, reproductive issues, high cholesterol, weight gain, weakened childhood immunity and low birth weight.

Limiting PFAS exposures

Learning what your water utility is doing to reduce PFAS in your drinking water is one of the most important things you can do to curb your exposure, experts told CNN in a May report. Utilities may be testing and making the data publicly available.

At home, you can use a water filter independently certified by the NSF, formerly the National Sanitation Foundation, or another official lab. Reverse osmosis filters are most effective but also more expensive.

You can also avoid using conventional nonstick cookware and opt for ceramic, glass, cast-iron or stainless steel

¿Tropas estadounidenses en Irán? Lo que piensan los estadounidenses y lo que significaría

Kraig Pakulski 0 11 Article rating: No rating

Por Aaron Blake

“No nos interesa un conflicto prolongado”, declaró el vicepresidente J. D. Vance en junio de 2025, horas después de que Estados Unidos llevara a cabo ataques aéreos contra las instalaciones nucleares de Irán. Y añadió: “No nos interesa el despliegue de tropas terrestres”.

Hoy, la administración tiene una postura diferente y se niega a descartar esa posibilidad, más de dos semanas después del inicio de una guerra más extensa con Irán. El presidente Donald Trump ya no resta importancia a la idea como antes, y cada vez hay más razones estratégicas para sospechar que podría ser una opción viable.

Si Trump fuera allí, sería una señal de que esta guerra ha tomado rumbos que no parecía haber previsto y de que se ha convertido en un riesgo político enorme.

Las encuestas realizadas desde los primeros ataques contra Irán, el mes pasado, sugieren que la idea de enviar tropas sobre el terreno es totalmente inaceptable para los estadounidenses en general, e incluso resulta difícil de vender a la base del Partido Republicano.

Y si bien la historia reciente sugiere que esa base podría acoger la idea con cierto entusiasmo, al menos en cierta medida, Trump está tentando a la suerte incluso con muchos de sus seguidores.

Pero parece haber cada vez más razones para que al menos una pequeña cantidad de fuerzas terrestres se despliegue en territorio iraní, ya sea para apoderarse de los materiales nucleares de Irán; para tomar el control de la estratégica isla de Kharg , objetivo reciente del Gobierno iraní; o para tomar territorio alrededor del estrecho de Ormuz y así facilitar el paso de buques petroleros. (Como informó CNN, la captura de las reservas de uranio altamente enriquecido, que se cree que se encuentran a gran profundidad, requeriría una presencia militar significativa, mucho mayor que la de un operativo especial).

En los últimos días, Trump se ha mostrado irritado ante las preguntas sobre esa posibilidad, pero ha dejado claro que es una opción que se reserva, a diferencia de hace nueve meses.

También supimos durante el fin de semana que la administración está desplegando una Unidad Expedicionaria de Infantería de Marina , una unidad de respuesta rápida que normalmente incluye a 2.500 infantes de Marina y marineros, en Medio Oriente por razones aún desconocidas.

El embajador de Estados Unidos en las Naciones Unidas, Mike Waltz, declaró el domingo a Fox News que “esto no va a ser otro Iraq de 2003. No habrá cientos de miles de soldados ocupando zonas urbanas en ningún lugar”.

Pero afirmó que las Fuerzas Armadas están ofreciendo opciones a Trump “para contar con fuerzas entrenadas, equipadas, posicionadas y listas para lo que sea que él decida hacer como comandante en jefe”.

Y Trump no está restándole importancia a la posibilidad tanto como lo hizo hace dos semanas, cuando la describió al New York Post como una situación del tipo “probablemente no las necesitemos” o “si fueran necesarias”.

El pueblo estadounidense parece esperar que no sean necesarias las tropas terrestres.

Una encuesta de CNN realizada poco después del inici

RSS
First23552356235723582360236223632364Last