Click on the Manage Content for adding and managing content.
Click on the Rotator Settings and choose what and how it will be displayed.

After three years as Iran’s hostage, the taxman came knocking

Kraig Pakulski 0 17 Article rating: No rating

By Joseph Ataman, CNN

Paris (CNN) — There’s no escape from the tax collector. At least that’s what Benjamin Brière must have felt after his return from three and half years as a hostage in Iran when he got that message that we all dread: he hadn’t filed his taxes.

The return of two French detainees from Iran this month has highlighted Brière’s run-in with French bureaucracy upon his own return to France in 2023, sparking a public apology this weekend from the French tax authority.

During his imprisonment, he did not complete his annual tax declarations for four years running, he said in an interview with French outlet Le Nouvel Obs in late 2025.

“But why sir?” he recounted the official from France’s tax authority (DGFiP) asking him as he sought to restart his life. “Even in prison you can do it.”

“Not in Iran,” Brière retorted, adding that the official then asked why his family had not done the declarations on his behalf.

Brière told the Journal du Net website last week that for the first year of his detention he had no contact at all with his family; in the second year he was given some 15 minutes by phone every four to six weeks. Back taxes evidently weren’t on his mind.

The Frenchman was travelling through Iran alone in 2020 when he was detained by security forces and later accused of espionage and propaganda against the regime, according to CNN affiliate BFMTV. He was sentenced to eight years and eight months in prison.

The response from the tax official who initially spoke with Brière was “unacceptable,” the DGFiP said in a post on X on Sunday, and the failure of support was “entirely contrary to our values.”

Brière’s situation was subsequently taken care of by an official in another region, the DGFIP said, adding that it has put measures in place to ensure no repeat of this situation.

France has one of the highest top income tax rates in the European Union and Briere’s treatment sparked a flurry of social media commentary in France, with some poking fun at the taxman’s pursuit of the government’s dues.

“Frankly, for the next hostages, we drop the diplomacy and the special forces. We send in a squad from the DGFiP that’ll bring back the taxpayer in a flash from any jail anywhere in the world,” one user posted on X.

Brière is campaigning for hostages to be given a special legal status to better protect people like him. While he said the French government took care of his hospital treatment upon his release, he said there was no official administrative support for his family during his detention nor for him upon his return to France.

French citizens Cécile Kohler and Jacques Paris returned to France in early April after a more than three-year-long ordeal in Iran.

Speaking to journalists, Kohler said that the pair had “lived daily horrors” at the infamous Evin prison in Tehran, and thanked everyone who had helped to secure their release.

Kohler and Paris were accused of spying for France and Israel and sentenced to lengthy prison terms in October 2025. The French government said they were held as state hostages.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

The post After three years as Iran’s hostage, the taxman came knocking appeared first on News Channel 3-12.

Judge tosses Trump’s Wall Street Journal defamation lawsuit, gives him chance to refile

Kraig Pakulski 0 20 Article rating: No rating
President Donald Trump arrives at the White House on April 12

By Andrew Kirell, Brian Stelter, CNN

(CNN) — A federal judge on Monday dismissed President Donald Trump’s defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over its reporting on a lewd birthday letter to Jeffrey Epstein bearing Trump’s name.

US District Judge Darrin P. Gayles ruled that Trump failed to plausibly allege the Rupert Murdoch-owned newspaper acted with “actual malice” when it reported the story.

Gayles dismissed the lawsuit without prejudice, meaning the saga is not over: Trump’s camp now has until April 27 to file an amended complaint addressing the judge’s concerns.

In order to proceed, Gayles wrote, Trump must adequately allege that the Journal knowingly published false information or acted with reckless disregard for the truth.

But Gayles said the original complaint instead relied on “formulaic” claims about malice and how the newspaper “knew or should have known” the story was false — coming “nowhere close” to the court’s standards for claiming defamation for a public figure such as Trump.

The judge also pointed to the Journal’s reporting process, noting that the article included Trump’s denial and reflected its efforts to seek comment from the White House, the Justice Department and the FBI.

“President Trump will follow Judge Gayles’s ruling and guidance to refile this powerhouse lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal and all of the other Defendants,” a spokesman for Trump’s legal team told CNN in a statement. “The President will continue to hold accountable those who traffic in Fake News to mislead the American People.”

Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit, filed last summer, was an extraordinary escalation of his ongoing legal campaign against media companies he views as opponents.

Legal experts consulted by CNN said they could not recall any past instances of a sitting president suing a news outlet over a story.

For Trump, though, it was a continuation of a pattern that dates back decades. He has frequently garnered publicity for filing lawsuits that ultimately fall apart in court.

Analysts speculated that Trump might have filed suit against the Journal to muddy the waters about the Epstein birthday book; to pressure Journal parent News Corp into a settlement payment; or to goad Murdoch in other ways.

Trump struck settlement deals with several other media companies after winning reelection. Murdoch’s camp, however, said it would not go the settlement route.

The Wall Street Journal did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Paula Reid and Liam Reilly contributed reporting.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

The post Judge tosses Trump’s Wall Street Journal defamation lawsuit, gives him chance to refile appeared first on News Channel 3-12.

Así fueron los incidentes que ensombrecieron las elecciones en Perú

Kraig Pakulski 0 18 Article rating: No rating

Por Mauricio Torres, CNN Español

Perú tuvo este domingo una larga jornada electoral, marcada por retrasos que desde temprano dificultaron la apertura de muchos centros de votación, generaron molestia entre candidatos y ciudadanos, derivaron en que se ampliara el horario para votar y demoraron el escrutinio.

Hasta la mañana de este lunes se ha computado poco más del 52 % de los votos, según la Oficina Nacional de Procesos Electorales (ONPE). Por ahora, los candidatos punteros son Keiko Fujimori, de Fuerza Popular, con casi el 17 %, y Rafael López Aliaga, con casi el 15 %, aunque no se descartan cambios.

En una contienda que tuvo 35 candidatos presidenciales, donde ninguno obtendría los votos suficientes para ganar en primera vuelta, los dos punteros irían a un balotaje el 7 de junio.

Los electores de Perú también votaron este domingo para elegir senadores y diputados —el país volverá a tener un Congreso bicameral—, así como representantes del Parlamento Andino.

Desde temprano, se registraron retrasos en la apertura de centros de votación, particularmente en el sur de Lima.

La ONPE dijo que la situación se debió a problemas logísticos en la entrega del material electoral. Argumentó que la empresa encargada del transporte incumplió con su trabajo, por lo que las autoridades electorales debieron activar un plan de contingencia.

El organismo aseguró que estos rezagos afectaban solamente al 0,072 % de los más de 10.000 centros de votación del país. Sin embargo, tanto algunos candidatos como ciudadanos comenzaron a expresar quejas, que más tarde se traducirían en acusaciones de posible “fraude”.

Por la tarde, luego de los retrasos en la apertura de centros de votación, el Jurado Nacional de Elecciones (JNE) anunció que el horario para votar se ampliaría por una hora hasta las 6:00 p.m., hora local (7:00 p.m. ET).

A la par, la Fiscalía de Perú informó que realizaba diligencias en la sede de la ONPE por el rezago en la entrega del material y para establecer “coordinaciones necesarias con los órganos electorales para garantizar el normal desarrollo de la jornada”.

Hasta la tarde de este domingo, la Fiscalía no había abierto una investigación por el asunto.

Frente a los retrasos, el JNE no solo amplió el horario para votar en la mayor parte del país. También informó que se extendía hasta este lunes a las 6:00 p.m. el plazo para votar en los centros que no pudieron instalarse el domingo.

En principio, la ONPE dijo que 15 centros no habían podido abrir, lo que se traducía en unos 63.000 electores afectados. Más tarde, corrigió la cifra y señaló que fueron 13 centros, es decir, unos 52.000 electores.

Los centros donde se prevé que se pueda votar hasta la tarde de este lunes están ubicados en Lima y en dos circunscripciones de Estados Unidos: Or

RSS
First20912092209320942096209820992100Last