Santa Barbara County News and Events

Jury finds Live Nation and Ticketmaster operated as a monopoly and overcharged fans

Kraig Pakulski 0 28 Article rating: No rating
Live Nation corporate offices are seen in Hollywood


CNN

By Kara Scannell, CNN

(CNN) — A jury found Live Nation and Ticketmaster operated as a monopoly in its dominance of the live events and ticketing industry, validating complaints that the industry giant was stifling competition and driving up fees for fans.

The verdict was reached following a lengthy trial in New York federal court that included testimony from top executives in the music and entertainment industries. Jurors began deliberating on Friday.

But fans won’t see ticket prices or fees tacked onto their bills drop anytime soon. Judge Arun Subramanian will now hold second trial to decide what remedies are warranted, including whether to grant the states’ request to break up the company or make other structural changes such as ordering the sale of businesses.

“It will be an earthquake in the industry in terms of people’s perception in feeling validated,” said Scott Grzenczyk, a lawyer with law firm Girard Sharp.

“There’s big difference between people complaining about Goliath and getting a jury verdict that Goliath was a monopolist and doing something wrong,” he added.

Live Nation, in a statement Wednesday, rebuffed the verdict saying that it plans to appeal “any unfavorable rulings” on pending motions.

“The jury’s verdict is not the last word on this matter. Pending motions will determine whether the liability and damages rulings stand,” the statement said.

Justice Department settled earlier

The Justice Department and 39 state attorneys general, including California and New York, and Washington, DC, sued Live Nation in 2024 alleging its combination with Ticketmaster and control of “virtually every aspect of the live music ecosystem” have harmed fans, artists, and venues.

“A jury found what we have long known to be true: Live Nation and Ticketmaster are breaking the law and costing consumers millions of dollars in the process,” New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat, said in a staetment Wednesday.

During the second week of trial, in a move that surprised even the judge, the Justice Department reached a secret settlement with Live Nation. A handful of states signed onto the deal, but more than two dozen proceeded to trial.

That settlement was agreed to just weeks after DOJ leadership pushed out Gail Slater, the antitrust division head known to advocate for her aggressive approach to the cases she oversaw.

In a social media post after the verdict, Slater congratulated the “mighty State AG coalition that stood behind this case.”

“You made antitrust history today. You fought the good fight, you finished the race, and you kept the faith,” Slater wrote.

Under the DOJ deal, Live Nation agreed to allow competitors, like SeatGeek or StubHub, to offer tickets to its events, cap ticketing service fees at 15%, and divest exclusive booking agreements with 13 amphitheaters. The deal includes a $280

Jury finds Live Nation and Ticketmaster operated as a monopoly and overcharged fans

Kraig Pakulski 0 21 Article rating: No rating
Live Nation corporate offices are seen in Hollywood


CNN, PRIME VIDEO, NETFLIX

By Kara Scannell, CNN

(CNN) — A jury found Live Nation and Ticketmaster operated as a monopoly in its dominance of the live events and ticketing industry, validating complaints that the industry giant was stifling competition and driving up fees for fans.

The verdict was reached following a lengthy trial in New York federal court that included testimony from top executives in the music and entertainment industries. Jurors began deliberating on Friday.

But fans won’t see ticket prices or fees tacked onto their bills drop anytime soon. Judge Arun Subramanian will now hold second trial to decide what remedies are warranted, including whether to grant the states’ request to break up the company or make other structural changes such as ordering the sale of businesses.

“It will be an earthquake in the industry in terms of people’s perception in feeling validated,” said Scott Grzenczyk, a lawyer with law firm Girard Sharp.

“There’s big difference between people complaining about Goliath and getting a jury verdict that Goliath was a monopolist and doing something wrong,” he added.

Live Nation, in a statement Wednesday, rebuffed the verdict saying that it plans to appeal “any unfavorable rulings” on pending motions.

“The jury’s verdict is not the last word on this matter. Pending motions will determine whether the liability and damages rulings stand,” the statement said.

Justice Department settled earlier

The Justice Department and 39 state attorneys general, including California and New York, and Washington, DC, sued Live Nation in 2024 alleging its combination with Ticketmaster and control of “virtually every aspect of the live music ecosystem” have harmed fans, artists, and venues.

“A jury found what we have long known to be true: Live Nation and Ticketmaster are breaking the law and costing consumers millions of dollars in the process,” New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat, said in a staetment Wednesday.

During the second week of trial, in a move that surprised even the judge, the Justice Department reached a secret settlement with Live Nation. A handful of states signed onto the deal, but more than two dozen proceeded to trial.

That settlement was agreed to just weeks after DOJ leadership pushed out Gail Slater, the antitrust division head known to advocate for her aggressive approach to the cases she oversaw.

In a social media post after the verdict, Slater congratulated the “mighty State AG coalition that stood behind this case.”

“You made antitrust history today. You fought the good fight, you finished the race, and you kept the faith,” Slater wrote.

Under the DOJ deal, Live Nation agreed to allow competitors, like SeatGeek or StubHub, to offer tickets to its events, cap ticketing service fees at 15%, and divest exclusive booking agreements with 13 amphitheaters. Th

Shakespeare owned a house in London. We finally know where it was

Kraig Pakulski 0 20 Article rating: No rating

By Jack Guy, CNN

London (CNN) — A chance find in a London archive has allowed a researcher to pinpoint the exact location of William Shakespeare’s London home for the first time.

It had long been known that the playwright owned a house in the Blackfriars, a 13th-century Dominican friary, and it was thought to have been located near the gatehouse.

But the new discovery means we now know its exact location, size and layout, as well as what kind of buildings would have surrounded it, Lucy Munro, Professor of Shakespeare and Early Modern Literature at King’s College London, England, told CNN on Tuesday.

“It was a really pleasant surprise,” she said, explaining that the information came to light when she found a plan of the district, dating from 1668, during research for a project on local playhouses at the London Archives.

After checking the plan against descriptions of the house featured in the existing scholarship, Munro realized that she had stumbled across definitive proof of its location and layout.

“It would have been sort of L-shaped, with part of it going over the gatehouse,” said Munro, who added that the plan shows the property sitting on top of the gatehouse, as well as neighboring buildings, such as the Sign of the Cock Tavern.

“It’s not huge, but it’s relatively substantial,” she added. “It was large enough to be subdivided into two houses at some point.”

When Shakespeare bought the house in 1613, Blackfriars would have been a prestigious area, said Munro, although it became increasingly socially mixed over time.

“There are lots of gentry in the area, but there are also increasingly tradespeople living in the area,” she said.

The discovery also sheds new light on Shakespeare’s later life, in the years prior to his death in 1616 at age 52, Munro said.

It questions the widely held belief that he retired to his hometown of Stratford-upon-Avon after the Globe playhouse, where most of his plays were performed for the first time, burned down in June 1613.

“It’s sometimes been conjectured that he kind of backs out at the point when the Globe burns down, but then we know that he’s still writing plays in the period following the Globe fire,” said Munro, referencing his collaboration with up-and-coming playwright John Fletcher on a play named “The Two Noble Kinsmen.”

Munro also questions the thesis that Shakespeare bought the Blackfriars property for financial gain.

“If he was just buying the property as an investment, there were lots of parts of London where he could have bought it,” she said.

“The fact that he buys it in the Blackfriars, which is less than five minutes’ walk from the (Globe) Playhouse, suggests to me that there’s a level of engagement with his professional life in London still in 1613,” said Munro.

“He’s not the isolated genius sitting in an attic. He’s somebody who’s collaborating with other playwrights. He’s somebody who owns shares in playhouses. He’s somebody who’s buying property in the Blackfriars,” she added. “So yeah, I think it gives us a slightly different picture to maybe the more standard one.”

More widely, Munro believes the find shows that there is still much to learn about Britain’s most famous playwright.

“I think there’s sometimes an assumption with things relating to Shakespeare biography that everything’s been gone over again and again, and there isn’t really anything left to find, when actually there are still some bits of the jigsaw puzzle kind of still out there,” said Munro, whose research will be published in the Times Literary Supplement on April 17.

Will Tosh, Director of Education at Shakespeare’s Globe, the modern theater and education center that stands on the site of the historic playhouse, said

Condenan a prisión en Corea del Sur al influencer estadounidense Johnny Somali por comportamiento ofensivo

Kraig Pakulski 0 15 Article rating: No rating

Por Hanna Park y Gawon Bae, CNN

El youtuber estadounidense Ramsey Khalid Ismael, “Johnny Somali”, fue condenado a seis meses de prisión por un tribunal de Seúl, según AP. El influencer provocó indignación nacional en Corea del Sur por acrobacias provocadoras, incluida bailar sobre una estatua que honra a las víctimas de la esclavitud sexual en tiempos de guerra.

El polémico creador de contenido es conocido por publicar en redes sociales excentricidades ofensivas y su caso está arrojando luz sobre el auge de los llamados “influencers molestos” que buscan llamar la atención en el extranjero.

En noviembre de 2025, Ismael, de 24 años, fue acusado formalmente de provocar una “conmoción” en una tienda de conveniencia, confirmaron a CNN los fiscales de Seúl. También se le impuso una prohibición de salida, que le impedía abandonar el país mientras las autoridades continuaban su investigación, informó la afiliada de CNN MBC News.

CNN se puso en contacto con Ismael para solicitar comentarios. No está claro si tiene un abogado.

Ismael ha sido vetado por múltiples empresas de redes sociales, después de que críticos lo acusaran de acosar a locales en países de toda Asia en un aparente esfuerzo por aumentar su audiencia en línea.

El transmisor en vivo tiene un seguimiento combinado de unas decenas de miles en Instagram, TikTok y Rumble. CNN se puso en contacto con las tres plataformas respecto al contenido de Ismael, pero no recibió respuesta de inmediato.

A principios de este mes, Ismael publicó una disculpa en línea después de que se le acusara de profanar un monumento surcoreano dedicado a mujeres sometidas a esclavitud sexual en la Segunda Guerra Mundial.

Locales enfurecidos amenazaron con represalias contra el transmisor en vivo en publicaciones en línea tras el incidente. Imágenes emitidas posteriormente por la afiliada de CNN JTBC mostraron a Ismael recibiendo una patada mientras un grupo de personas lo seguía. Por separado, un hombre fue arrestado en Seúl el mes pasado por presuntamente golpear a Ismael en la cara, informó la agencia de noticias Yonhap. La policía de Seúl declinó hacer comentarios.

La reacción pública en Corea del Sur pareció reflejar una frustración más amplia en la región con los extranjeros que explotan las costumbres locales para obtener fama en línea, siendo Ismael un ejemplo extremo de mal comportamiento.

Según informes de noticias japoneses, recientemente se ha acusado a creadores de contenido extranjeros de una serie de transgresiones en el país, desde evadir el pago de tarifas ferroviarias hasta hacer dominadas en una puerta de santuario y “bailes molestos” en trenes del metro de Tokio.

Esto coincide con un empeoramiento del sentimiento hacia el turismo masivo entre muchos japoneses, mientras el país experimenta cifras récord de visitantes y un aumento en los reportes de turistas que se portan mal.

A principios de este mes, un turista estadounidense de 65 años fue arrestado en Tokio por presuntamente tallar letras en una puerta de santuario, apenas dos meses después de que un hombre austríaco de 61 años fuera arrestado por tener relaciones sexuales en los terrenos de un santuario.

El reciente viaje de Ismael a Japón también estuvo rodeado de controversia.

El año pasado, el streamer fue arrestado en Osaka bajo sospecha de allanamiento en una obra de construcción, según la agencia de noticias Kyodo. Ismael también causó indignación en Japón al publicar videos de sí mismo burlándose de los viajeros sobre los bombardeos atómicos de Hiroshima y Nagasaki, mientras profería insultos.

John Lie, profesor de sociología en la Universidad de California, Berkeley, dijo que Ismael sirve como un ejemplo aleccionador sobre los riesgos de ignorar los límites culturales en un mundo interconectado.

Aunque era posible que tuviera un motivo más profundo, el comport

RSS
First20132014201520162018202020212022Last